Accenture Faces Class Action Over Alleged Widespread Racial Discrimination Favoring Asians
A prospective class action employment discrimination lawsuit has been filed in Connecticut against management consulting company Accenture.
June 12, 2019 at 05:27 PM
3 minute read
A white San Francisco resident has sued Accenture PLC and Accenture LLP in Connecticut, claiming the global management consulting and professional services company discriminates against non-Asians.
In the prospective class action employment discrimination lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the District for Connecticut, Matthew Walker alleges discrimination is rampant at the company, which has global headquarters in Ireland, 459,000 employees worldwide and about 51,800 throughout various locations in the United States, including an office in Hartford.
The alleged discrimination at Accenture, which contracts with U.S. companies to provide information technology-related services, is “pervasive,” according to the 18-page lawsuit.
“Accenture has engaged in a systematic, company-wide pattern or practice of discrimination in favor of South Asians and against individuals who are not South Asian, in hiring and employment decisions,” the lawsuit says. Accenture's service offerings are consolidated into five separate businesses. The lawsuit says the Accenture Technology and Accenture Consulting divisions are at least 70 percent South Asian, primarily from Indian-American workers.
Accenture recruiters, the suit says, “disproportionately seeks out and recruits South Asian candidates.” The company then “gives these candidates preference over comparably or better qualified non-South Asian candidates,” according to the complaint.
Walker, the plaintiff, worked for the company from November 2011 through June 2015, when he was terminated. The lawsuit said Walker, who holds a degree in accounting and information systems, got rave reviews from many of the clients from around the country who he helped with IT issues. Those clients, the lawsuit said, included Warner Brothers, Best Buy, Qualcomm and Target.
“However, despite his strong performance as an application performance consultant, Mr. Walker was never promoted by Accenture during his 3 1/2 years with the company,” according to the lawsuit.
The lawsuit notes that once an employee finished servicing a client, they are, as the company calls it, “benched” and must apply again through an application and interview process, just like external candidates.
The lawsuit alleges non-South Asians “are disproportionately relegated to the bench and unable to secure new positions within Accenture.”
According to the lawsuit, Walker was told in June 2015 that he was being terminated “due to his prolonged bench period and lack of billable hours. … The true reason for his termination was Accenture's pattern or practice of discrimination.”
The lawsuit seeks certification as a class, a declaratory judgment that the alleged discrimination laid out in the lawsuit is unlawful and violates the Civil Rights Act of 1866, pre- and post-judgment awards for the plaintiff and class, and front and back pay for Walker.
As of Wednesday afternoon, Accenture had not assigned an attorney to represent it in the lawsuit. Company representative Stacey Jones and Chad Jerdee, its general counsel and chief compliance officer, did not respond to a request for comment Wednesday.
Representing Walker are Michael Reilly of Hartford-based Cicchiello & Cicchiello and Daniel Kotchen, Michael von Klemperer and Lindsey Grunert from Washington, D.C.-based Kotchen & Low. Reilly referred media inquiries to the Washington, D.C., attorneys, but Kotchen declined to comment and von Klemperer and Grunert did not respond to a request for comment.
Judge Janet Bond Arterton is scheduled to hear the case.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
State High Court Adopts Modern Standard for Who Keeps $70K Engagement Ring After Breakup
Mass. Judge Declares Mistrial in Talc Trial: 'Court Can't Accommodate This Case'
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 2Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 3McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
- 4Amazon, SpaceX Press Constitutional Challenges to NLRB at 5th Circuit
- 5Schools Win Again: Social Media Fails to Strike Public Nuisance Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250