Teacher Who Posted Seminude Photos to Support Donald Trump Sues School That Fired Her
A teacher who was fired from the Grove School, a private boarding and day school in Madison, Connecticut, has sued the school for monetary damages. She claims administrators fired her after they learned she had posed seminude in a 2016 photo spread in support of then-presidential candidate Donald Trump.
June 18, 2019 at 05:30 PM
4 minute read
A woman who posed seminude for an online entertainment site in October 2016 for then-presidential candidate Donald Trump has sued the Connecticut private school that fired her in the wake of the photo shoot.
Chelsy Zelasko posed for six pictures in which American flags and firearms covered her nude body. Her employer, Madison-based Grove School, then fired her in April after she refused to resign, according to a lawsuit filed in New Haven Superior Court.
But Zelasko alleges the 85-year-old boarding and day school violated her First Amendment freedom of expression rights when it fired her.
The school has not responded to the suit. No lawyer has entered an appearance on its behalf, and executive director Peter Chorney declined to comment Tuesday.
The school has approximately 160 students, according to its website.
The dispute stems from website BetterThanTheWeekend.com's publication of the photos days before the November 2016 presidential election. That website, which debuted in 2016, has a running feature in which it highlights ordinary people posing seminude. Other similar posts included a feature on a mayoral candidate in Scranton, Pennsylvania, and one of an illegal immigrant answering questions on his dream of becoming an American citizen.
Zelasko's photo spread included an interview with the teacher on immigration policy, Hillary Clinton, the Second Amendment and other topics.
The lawsuit alleges Grove School administrators became aware of the photo shoot in April, two months after they hired the Pennsylvania native as a teacher. It claims Zelasko was well within her rights under the First Amendment to pose for the article.
But the school thought otherwise.
|'Your credibility is now a major concern'
The lawsuit alleges Chorney, the executive director, contacted Zelasko on April 3 and asked her to leave the job, but the teacher refused.
According to the complaint, Zelasko sent Chorney an email saying, “I am not going to resign for expressing my views that I believe in and exercising my constitutional rights.”
In response, according to the lawsuit, Chorney wrote back: “The issue is about role-modeling for emotionally fragile kids and holding oneself to a higher standard as an educator. Your credibility is now a major concern.”
In a subsequent letter soon after, the lawsuit says, Chorney fired Zelasko. In the termination letter, according to the suit, Chorney wrote: “We viewed and read these postings and saw that some photos use assault weapons to cover your private parts. In one photo, you are covering your breasts with American flags and sticking out your tongue.”
The Chorney letter continues: “Although you have been a capable teacher so far, you can no longer serve that role for us. We do not believe you can serve as a role model for these adolescents, as a school with a public presence and a community identity.”
Chorney declined to comment for this article and the school does not have a legal department.
Zelasko, the lawsuit said, believes she was fired for exercising her freedom of expressions, and “in particular, her fervent support for then-candidate Donald J. Trump, and her vocal promotion of Second Amendment rights.”
The lawsuit, which claims Zelasko has suffered “significant emotional distress,” seeks punitive damages, attorney fees and reinstatement of front pay.
Zelasko's attorney, Cicchiello & Cicchiello associate Matthew Paradisi, was in court all day Tuesday and was not available for comment by press time.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
State High Court Adopts Modern Standard for Who Keeps $70K Engagement Ring After Breakup
Trending Stories
- 1'Everything Leaves a Digital Footprint': How to Navigate the Complexities of Internal Investigations
- 2Baker McKenzie Accepts Defeat on Australian Integration With Firm's Asia Practice
- 3PepsiCo's Legal Team Champions Diversity, Wellness, and Mentorship to Shape a Thriving Corporate Culture
- 4The Dynamic Duo Behind CMG's Legal Ops Team
- 5Land Use Issues Presented By Cold Storage Warehouses
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250