Hartford Jury Awards $341,000 to Contractor Who Fell From Defective Basement Step
A Superior Court jury has awarded Stefan Gardner $341,000 after he fell from a defective step in the basement of a vacant home. The contractor fractured his ankle. The defendants filed motions to set aside the verdict.
June 20, 2019 at 02:27 PM
3 minute read
A Superior Court jury has awarded $341,000 to Southington contractor Stefan Gardner, who fractured his ankle after falling down a defective step in a basement in a vacant Bristol house he was inspecting.
The jury found the building's owners—a bank and two other entities—negligent. It also awarded Gardner's wife $50,000 for loss of consortium, in addition to the six-figure award to her husband.
The injury occurred in a vacant house that CIT Bank N.A. took possession of after its tenant died in October 2015. The house has been vacant for nearly a year when in September 2016, Gardner, an independent contractor with Twenty Two Hill LLC, was asked to inspect it. While on that inspection, Gardner, 50, descended the stairwell that leads to the basement and fell four feet, due to a defective step, according to his amended lawsuit filed in November 2017.
At issue was who would be liable for Gardner's fall.
Peter Bowman, Gardner's Stratford-based attorney, sued the estate of the woman who had lived in the house. He also named CIT Bank, Twenty Two Hill, and a third corporate defendant: National Field Representatives Inc.
Bowman, a partner with Billings, Barrett & Bowman, said that CIT Bank contracts with National Field Representatives, which is a company that has people do walk-through inspections of vacant homes or homes in default. Since National Field Representatives is based in New Hampshire, the company contacted Twenty Two Hill, which had Gardner inspect the property.
The jury found the estate was not liable, but held the three companies accountable. It also found Gardner 10% liable, cutting the award by about $38,000 for a total of $391,000 to Gardner and his wife.
At trial all three companies argued they weren't responsible for fixing the stairs. The defendants have since filed motions to set aside the verdict. No ruling has been made.
“I argued they had no time to fix the stair, but they were able to cut the lawn and make the house look nice on the outside,” said Bowman, who noted the defendants were aware that other inspections on four separate occasions had reported the defective stair.
Bowman said the jury found his client to be 10% at fault because when he went to the home he was given notes, including one about the step being defective.
“The note said there was a broken basement stair,” Bowman said, “My client admitted that he failed to look at the note. That humility was well received by the jury.”
Bowman said Gardner had 11 screws and a plate put in to repair his ankle. “He was in a lot of pain,” Bowman said. “Today, things have improved, but he still has pain about once or twice a week.”
Representing Twenty Two Hill is Bruce Newman of Brown, Paindiris & Scott. Newman did not respond to a request for comment.
Representing CIT Bank and National Field Representatives is Brian Rich of Halloran & Sage. Rich declined to comment Thursday.
In its motion to set aside the verdict, the defendants argued there was not sufficient evidence and a lack of factual evidence to support the jury's verdict claim that they were negligent.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDC Judge Rules Russia Not Immune in Ukrainian Arbitration Award Dispute
2 minute readRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
Trending Stories
- 1Authenticating Electronic Signatures
- 2'Fulfilled Her Purpose on the Court': Presiding Judge M. Yvette Miller Is 'Ready for a New Challenge'
- 3Litigation Leaders: Greenspoon Marder’s Beth-Ann Krimsky on What Makes Her Team ‘Prepared, Compassionate and Wicked Smart’
- 4A Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
- 5Grabbing Market Share From Rivals, Law Firms Ramped Up Group Lateral Hires
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250