Hartford Jury Awards $341,000 to Contractor Who Fell From Defective Basement Step
A Superior Court jury has awarded Stefan Gardner $341,000 after he fell from a defective step in the basement of a vacant home. The contractor fractured his ankle. The defendants filed motions to set aside the verdict.
June 20, 2019 at 02:27 PM
3 minute read
A Superior Court jury has awarded $341,000 to Southington contractor Stefan Gardner, who fractured his ankle after falling down a defective step in a basement in a vacant Bristol house he was inspecting.
The jury found the building's owners—a bank and two other entities—negligent. It also awarded Gardner's wife $50,000 for loss of consortium, in addition to the six-figure award to her husband.
The injury occurred in a vacant house that CIT Bank N.A. took possession of after its tenant died in October 2015. The house has been vacant for nearly a year when in September 2016, Gardner, an independent contractor with Twenty Two Hill LLC, was asked to inspect it. While on that inspection, Gardner, 50, descended the stairwell that leads to the basement and fell four feet, due to a defective step, according to his amended lawsuit filed in November 2017.
At issue was who would be liable for Gardner's fall.
Peter Bowman, Gardner's Stratford-based attorney, sued the estate of the woman who had lived in the house. He also named CIT Bank, Twenty Two Hill, and a third corporate defendant: National Field Representatives Inc.
Bowman, a partner with Billings, Barrett & Bowman, said that CIT Bank contracts with National Field Representatives, which is a company that has people do walk-through inspections of vacant homes or homes in default. Since National Field Representatives is based in New Hampshire, the company contacted Twenty Two Hill, which had Gardner inspect the property.
The jury found the estate was not liable, but held the three companies accountable. It also found Gardner 10% liable, cutting the award by about $38,000 for a total of $391,000 to Gardner and his wife.
At trial all three companies argued they weren't responsible for fixing the stairs. The defendants have since filed motions to set aside the verdict. No ruling has been made.
“I argued they had no time to fix the stair, but they were able to cut the lawn and make the house look nice on the outside,” said Bowman, who noted the defendants were aware that other inspections on four separate occasions had reported the defective stair.
Bowman said the jury found his client to be 10% at fault because when he went to the home he was given notes, including one about the step being defective.
“The note said there was a broken basement stair,” Bowman said, “My client admitted that he failed to look at the note. That humility was well received by the jury.”
Bowman said Gardner had 11 screws and a plate put in to repair his ankle. “He was in a lot of pain,” Bowman said. “Today, things have improved, but he still has pain about once or twice a week.”
Representing Twenty Two Hill is Bruce Newman of Brown, Paindiris & Scott. Newman did not respond to a request for comment.
Representing CIT Bank and National Field Representatives is Brian Rich of Halloran & Sage. Rich declined to comment Thursday.
In its motion to set aside the verdict, the defendants argued there was not sufficient evidence and a lack of factual evidence to support the jury's verdict claim that they were negligent.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Administration Faces Legal Challenge Over EO Impacting Federal Workers
3 minute readSettlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Sides With Retail Display Company in Patent Dispute Against Campbell Soup, Grocery Stores
- 2Is It Time for Large UK Law Firms to Begin Taking Private Equity Investment?
- 3Federal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Launch Defensive Measure
- 4Class Action Litigator Tapped to Lead Shook, Hardy & Bacon's Houston Office
- 5Arizona Supreme Court Presses Pause on KPMG's Bid to Deliver Legal Services
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250