5 Things to Know About Judge John Blawie, Who Heard Connecticut's Last Death Penalty Case
From Bernie Madoff to Sandy Hook school shooting proceedings, Superior Court Judge John Blawie has had an impactful career.
July 25, 2019 at 02:13 PM
4 minute read
U.S. Attorney General William Barr announced Thursday he has directed the Federal Bureau of Prisons to adopt a proposed addendum to the federal execution protocol, which would clear the way for the federal government to resume capital punishment after a nearly two-decade lapse.
The news from Washington, D.C., might have a familiar ring to Superior Court Judge John Blawie, who five years ago handled the last death penalty case in the state before the Connecticut Supreme Court ruled capital punishment unconstitutional.
The Connecticut Law Tribune spoke to Blawie, currently a judge in the Norwalk-Stamford Judicial District, about his resume, years on the bench and his relationship with his father, who was a longtime Connecticut attorney.
Blawie's had a successful career as a lawyer and Superior Court judge. He handled complex cases as an attorney for the Division of Enforcement for the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission, was in-house counsel for two companies, worked as a senior assistant state attorney for Connecticut's Economic Crime Unit, and then rose to become a Superior Court judge 15 years ago.
Here are five things to know about the judge:
|He resentenced Richard Roszkowski
Blawie's resume is one of note. It includes the case of Richard Roszkowski, who Blawie had sentenced to death before the Connecticut Supreme Court ruled capital punishment unconstitutional.
Roszkowski was convicted of killing three people, including a mother and daughter, in Bridgeport. Blawie later had to resentence him to life without the possibility of release.
|He presided over a Bernie Madoff case
Blawie was also the judge who handled several matters related to the town of Fairfield and the money-bilking scheme of Bernard Madoff. The town lost about $35 million in pension funds to the landmark Ponzi scheme, and Blawie handed down several rulings on whether it had a direct cause of action against feeder funds that invested with Madoff.
|His pivotal role after Sandy Hook school shooting
Blawie also was the judge in Danbury Superior Court at the time of the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre. He signed all the search warrants for authorities to go into the home of the shooter, Adam Lanza, and confiscate his computers, car and internet records.
|He adjudicated high-profile chimpanzee case
Blawie also handled a case that made national news when a chimpanzee mauled Stamford woman Charla Nash. Blawie ruled it was a strict liability case because the animal was considered wild.
|His father was an attorney
Blawie said his biggest influence, cheerleader and mentor was his father Paul, a well-known and respected attorney who was in private practice for about 45 years and founded Cohen and Wolf, which was originally named Blawie & Wolf.
Today, Blawie has fostered a reputation as a prepared and fair jurist. But the 61-year-old judge said his attributes can be traced to what his father taught him about life and the law.
“He had such a tremendous influence on me,” said Blawie, who grew up one of 12 siblings in Fairfield and Bridgeport. “I saw him as a force for good in the world. He was so larger than life, and he thought law was a noble profession.”
As the seventh of 12 children, Blawie said half-seriously, “I was schooled in conflict resolution.”
Blawie clerked for his father for two years while attending the University of Connecticut School of Law, where he graduated in 1983.
“I learned about law and the philosophy of law from him,” he said.
Blawie has two sons and a daughter and lives in Greenwich.
Blawie said he's most proud in his time on the bench of “helping a few people along the way.” That, Blawie said, means that not every person who pleads guilty, or is found guilty, needs to necessarily go to jail.
“First[-time] offenders come before the court and I have the discretion of giving diversionary programs for that first offender. Incarceration is not always the answer,” Blawie said. “We try to instill accountability.”
So, Blawie said, he might give a person whose crime was assault another chance in ordering attendance in a family violence education program, or someone convicted of an alcohol-related crime a chance to get his life back on track in participating in accelerated rehabilitation or an alcoholic education program.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllConnecticut Movers: New Hires at SkiberLaw, Verrill and Silver Golub & Teitell
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250