Columbia Gas of Massachusetts Pays $143M to Settle Class Actions Over Fires, Explosions
Plaintiffs attorneys and attorneys for Columbia Gas of Massachusetts announced Monday the company had agreed to settle numerous class actions stemming from fires and explosions in three Massachusetts communities.
July 29, 2019 at 01:52 PM
3 minute read
Columbia Gas of Massachusetts has agreed to settle multiple class actions arising out of the September 2018 Merrimack Valley fires and explosions for $143 million.
The fires and explosions killed an 18-year-old in his driveway, injured more than 20 people and impacted thousands of residents and businesses in Lawrence, Andover and North Andover, Massachusetts. The explosions were caused from an over-pressurization in the system that Columbia Gas owns.
Plaintiff attorneys and NiSource, the parent company of Columbia Gas, announced the settlement Monday morning.
Residents and businesses will be able to submit claims after the settlement receives final approval from the court, which is expected to occur before the end of the year.
Plaintiff's co-lead counsel, Frank Petosa of Morgan & Morgan's Boston office, said the settlement was fair. He said the company “operated in good faith, in both the claims process to help people, and were willing partners to get to where we were able to get today.”
As part of the settlement agreement, more than 10 class actions and many individual claims, which were consolidated, will be dropped. Petosa said the only claims that can still move forward are those dealing with bodily injury and those that casualty insurers are pursuing against the company.
“Many individuals and companies might have been compensated for out-of-pocket expenses, but we don't believe they have yet to be compensated for the impact it had on their day-to-day lives, meaning for residents displaced and lives destroyed,” Petosa said. “Our goal is to make sure everyone is made whole.”
In a statement from Columbia Gas' website, Joe Hamrock, NiSource's chief executive officer and president, said the settlement is an important step.
“What happened last September was tragic, and we will always be mindful of its impact on our customers and everyone in the communities we serve, including those represented by this settlement,” Hamrock said. “Today marks another important step forward, as we continue to fulfill our commitment to residents and businesses. We are pleased that we have reached a resolution so swiftly, and we thank the mediator, as well as all involved who helped us achieve this result.”
In addition to the settlement, NiSource said it dedicated about $1 billion to recovery efforts, including restoration work on houses and businesses, and sourcing and installing equipment and about 18,500 new appliances.
Representing the gas company were Melick & Porter attorney John Rooney III, of Southborough, Massachusetts, and J. Brian Jackson, of McGuireWoods in Charlottesville, Virginia. Neither responded to a request for comment Monday.
Assisting Petosa were John Roddy of Bailey & Glasser, Elizabeth Graham of Grant & Eisenhofer, and Leo Boyle and Brad Henry of Meehan, Boyle, Black & Bogdanow.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDC Judge Rules Russia Not Immune in Ukrainian Arbitration Award Dispute
2 minute readRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
Trending Stories
- 1Authenticating Electronic Signatures
- 2'Fulfilled Her Purpose on the Court': Presiding Judge M. Yvette Miller Is 'Ready for a New Challenge'
- 3Litigation Leaders: Greenspoon Marder’s Beth-Ann Krimsky on What Makes Her Team ‘Prepared, Compassionate and Wicked Smart’
- 4A Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
- 5Grabbing Market Share From Rivals, Law Firms Ramped Up Group Lateral Hires
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250