Hmmm … Is Ax-Throwing in Bars Really a Good Idea?
The current operators in Connecticut appear to being doing a good job in protecting their patrons, but darts are one thing—axes are quite another.
August 01, 2019 at 04:58 PM
4 minute read
Public regulation has never been able to anticipate what smart and not-so-smart people can come up with. Most recently, ridehailing, e.g., Uber and Lyft, headed on down the road long before government could catch up. Short-term-rentals—and here we have Airbnb and VRBO—have been a boon for some homeowners and the bane of local governments and the neighbors who suffer with party houses next door.
Now comes ax throwing in bars. It’s hard to find out where this inane and insane idea started. We do know that 13 years ago, the Backyard Axe Throwing League was formed in Toronto among a group that had set up a target in Matt Wilson’s backyard. Wilson became the founder and CEO of the league. The league, in turn, became one of the founders of the National Axe Throwing Federation (NATF), with 36 members and 6,000 throwers. Like others “sports,” there are many other leagues, such as the World Axe Throwing League.
Go to Wikipedia, the source of all things obvious, and you can read this important caution: “The sport of axe throwing deals with a potentially dangerous weapon, so the throwing area must be kept safe at all times. … A First Aid kit and a person trained in First Aid and CPR should be at hand in the event of an emergency.”
Then come the defenders, such as ClutchAxes, a company selling throwing axes, which makes the oh-so-compelling argument that it is safe because ax throwing is mostly done in bars: “[I]t goes to show just how safe it really is when just about every single location offers alcohol. As previously mentioned, the people that work inside are trained to spot misconduct almost instantly, and the logistics of it all really makes it difficult to cause an accident even if you are being careless.”
Proof positive of the inherent danger can be found in the lawsuit recently brought against Fox News because “Fox and Friends” host Peter Hegseth overthrew an ax and hit Jeff Propserie, causing permanent injuries when the ax hit his elbow broadside. It could have been much worse.
It is a mixed bag across the country and here in Connecticut. Myrtle Beach denied an outdoor one in 2018, but this year two will open indoors. Brooklyn Community Board 1 denied a beer and wine license for “Bury the Hatchet,” a Greenpoint bar, because of the ax throwing. In Enfield, Connecticut, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved one. That one joins others in Newington, Hartford and Wallingford, and another reportedly forthcoming in Fairfield County.
Is the risk worth the reward? Ax throwing is fine, if that’s your thing, but not where alcohol is served, unless the activity could be limited to those who are sober. The SuperCharged electric go-kart track in Montville has a full-service bar and reserves the right to require a Breathalyzer test for any driver. No one can race if they are above 0.00. That may be impractical elsewhere.
Perhaps if the ax throwing area were off on its own as they typically are, participants took a breathalyzer test, threw their axes, and then adjourned to the bar to brag about their skill … that might work and would be fun. But starting in the bar and advancing to ax throwing is not a good idea.
Connecticut needs to take a long, hard look at this combination of ax throwing and alcohol, and consider banning alcohol where people are throwing axes, or requiring all participants to pass a Breathalyzer test, or at least mandating some significant insurance, safe design, and state-approved informed consent. The current operators in Connecticut appear to being doing a good job in protecting their patrons, but darts are one thing—axes are quite another.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllADVANCE Act Offers Conn. Opportunity to Enhance Carbon-Free Energy and Improve Reliability With Advanced Nuclear Technologies
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250