As Jury Deliberated, Connecticut Lawyers Reached $20M Settlement in Wrongful Death Case
The estate of Ana Cristina Vomoca settled with defendants Jeffrey Bodnar and the companies that employed him as a driver—Food Haulers Inc. and its parent company Wakefern Food Corp. Vomoca died soon after the truck Bodnar was driving struck her car.
August 02, 2019 at 05:36 PM
4 minute read
Attorneys for insurance carriers and for the estate of a 38-year-old woman who died soon after a 23,000-pound truck struck her car reached a $19.75 million settlement just as jurors were deliberating on the case.
Both sides informed the six-person jury in Stamford Superior Court at noon Friday that they had reached the settlement.
The jury, which heard five days of testimony, had been in its fourth hour of deliberations, according to Angelo Ziotas, one of the attorneys representing the estate of Cristina Vomoca. Ziotas is a partner with Stamford-based Silver Golub & Teitell.
According to Ziotas and the amended lawsuit filed July 29, defendant Jeffrey Bodnar was speeding in a truck, and had gone through a red light when he slammed into the driver’s side of Vomoca’s 2015 Maserati Ghibli.
Vomoca, who was coming home from her job at a Greenwich hair salon, died in November 2016, eight days after the accident. The incident occurred near the Interstate 95 ramp near Arch Street in Greenwich.
Bodnar is out on bail and faces manslaughter charges.
Vomoca’s passenger in the car was Mai Kobayaski, her best friend and a co-worker. Kobayaski survived but suffered brain damage. She settled with the insurance carriers for an undisclosed sum soon after the incident.
Paul Wilson, Vomoca’s boyfriend, filed a suit on behalf of the couple’s 4-year-old son, Oliver, who will receive the settlement money when he turns 18 years old.
“The Probate Court will supervise this,” Ziotas said. “The boy will get all of the money, but that does not make up for the loss of his mother.”
The attorney said he believed the defense agreed to settle during jury deliberations because “we had absolutely proven that Mr. Bodnar was not only negligent, but also reckless.”
Two eyewitnesses said they saw Bodnar go through the red light, according to Ziotas. One of them allegedly had cellphone images that showed Bodnar’s truck passing the red light. Plus, plaintiffs counsel said his team was able to use data downloaded from a black box on the truck to prove Bodnar was traveling 35 mph, when the speed limit on the ramp was 25 mph.
“We demonstrated, without any doubt, that the defendant was responsible, and that he blew the red light and was speeding on the ramp,” said Ziotas, who handled the litigation with co-counsel Marco Allocca and Sarah Ricciardi.
The defendants were Bodnar, and the companies that employed him as a driver, Food Haulers Inc., and its parent company, Wakefern Food Corp.
Representing the insurance carriers for the trucking companies was Christopher Sanetti, a partner with Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith in Hartford.
Sanetti did not respond to a request for comment, but in court pleadings, the defendants argued that the other side couldn’t prove that Bodnar had gone through the red light. It said the plaintiff relied on unreliable eyewitnesses.
The defense’s previous high offer was $9 million, Ziotas said.
But by toward the end of the trial, both sides were ready to conclude the litigation.
Ziotas said, “We were interested in resolving the case fully without having an appeal.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Administration Faces Legal Challenge Over EO Impacting Federal Workers
3 minute readSettlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250