Connecticut's Ongoing Failure to Address Property Tax Dependence
Limiting property tax dependence requires more state funding to local governments, which means raising more state revenue from other taxes, but this is necessary to make Connecticut the prosperous, just, and integrated state that it can and must be.
August 22, 2019 at 03:05 PM
3 minute read
Property tax dependence is killing our state, but we keep failing to fix it. Connecticut has the third-highest property taxes in the country; we are fifth in property taxes as a percentage of state revenue. Property tax dependence is even more extreme for our cities and towns. In Connecticut, 60 percent of local revenue comes from property taxes, compared with 30 percent across the nation. Unlike other property tax-dependent states such as New Hampshire and Massachusetts, we do little to equalize revenue between property rich and poor municipalities. This exacerbates inequality, undermines efforts at regionalization, and kills economic development in our struggling cities. Yet another legislative session has come and gone without any effort to address property tax dependence.
Property tax dependence undermines the health of our struggling cities. Plagued by low-value real estate, cities must raise property taxes higher than surrounding towns. The annual cost of these taxes is capitalized into sales prices, driving property value even lower. This hits both residents and businesses hard. In Hartford, for example, commercial property taxes are double residential rates, driving businesses away from the city. Making matters worse, in cities such as Hartford, New Haven, and Bridgeport, much of the land base is occupied by government and nonprofit entities that don't pay property taxes. Although the state makes payments in lieu of taxes (PILOTs) on state property, PILOTs are inadequate and inconsistent.
Property tax dependence also continues wasteful divided governance between our 169 cities and towns. With most revenue coming from property taxes, cities and towns have little incentive to regionalize services. If you're raising the money yourself without much help from the state, why share services with your neighbor? Even worse, why not zone out higher-density affordable housing and limit the number of residents receiving those services?
Also, with funding for services—particularly schools—dependent on local real estate wealth, inequality between municipalities runs rampant. Connecticut has one of the highest rates of income inequality in the country. It has the greatest educational achievement gap between rich and poor students. It also has some of the most serious residential segregation. There are many causes for these disparities, but municipal reliance on property taxes is at least one of them.
Although former Gov. Dannel Malloy promised to address property tax dependence, little changed under his administration, and Gov. Ned Lamont has not even tried. The Legislature did not address the problem during its most recent session either, though at least it did not exacerbate the issue by increasing state credits for local property taxes.
There are no easy solutions. Limiting property tax dependence requires more state funding to local governments, which means raising more state revenue from other taxes, and likely claiming a portion of local tax revenues for redistribution. But while the solutions aren't easy, they are necessary to make Connecticut the prosperous, just, and integrated state that it can and must be.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllADVANCE Act Offers Conn. Opportunity to Enhance Carbon-Free Energy and Improve Reliability With Advanced Nuclear Technologies
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250