Counsel Fired Up Over $1.5M Win for Client Accused of Burning Down His House
Seven attorneys faced off in a Supreme Court liability case following a house fire. The court upheld a $1.5 million verdict for homeowner C. Andrew Riley in his breach-of-contract lawsuit against Marine Insurance Co.
September 05, 2019 at 12:26 PM
3 minute read
Attorneys from Murtha Cullina prevailed over their counterparts at Robinson & Cole in a $1.5 million fire liability case in front of the Connecticut Supreme Court.
The Murtha attorneys successfully represented homeowner C. Andrew Riley in his breach-of-contract lawsuit against Robinson & Cole's client, Marine Insurance Co., for failing to cover his losses after a 2009 fire. Travelers had argued Riley's use of a kerosene heater caused the flames, but a jury awarded him $1 million for emotional distress and $504,000 for breach of contract.
"We hold that the defendant waived its right to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence in the plaintiff's case-in-chief, and the trial court properly relied on the defendant's evidence when it denied the defendant's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict," the high court ruled, finding for Riley, and upholding the Connecticut Appellate Court.
Here is a look at the attorneys on both sides of the litigation:
|For the Plaintiff:
Proloy Das, chair of Murtha Cullina's appellate practice group, has argued more than 60 appeals before the Connecticut Supreme Court, Connecticut Appellate Court and U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, according to his firm biography. He represented Republican Party candidates for state legislature seeking access to a third-party ballot line after receiving cross-endorsement. He also advanced legal doctrines in cases of first impression involving elections, torts, municipalities, contracts, insurance and felony prosecutions.
Murtha Cullina partner Kristen Zaehringer handles commercial litigation, professional malpractice, labor and employment, and local counsel services. Her focus includes breach of contract, consumer fraud, unfair trade practices, violation of state and federal credit reporting laws, business torts and confidentiality agreements.
Leonard Isaac, of Farmington-based Isaac Law Offices, represents plaintiffs in insurance disputes.
JIm Nugent, lead trial attorney for North Haven-based Nugent & Bryant, concentrates his practice on personal injury, wrongful death, defamation, assault and vehicular crashes. He served in the Connecticut Army National Guard as an infantryman for 11 years.
|For the Defense:
Robinson & Cole's appellate practice group chair Linda Morkan has handled more than 200 appeals since joining the firm in 1988. She has appeared before the Connecticut Supreme and Appellate courts, the U.S. Supreme Court, multiple federal appellate tribunals and Rhode Island's highest court. She focuses on bankruptcy, environment, insurance, reinsurance, regulatory, land use, tax and probate cases. She clerked for Connecticut Appellate Court Judge Daniel Spallone after graduating law school.
Her colleague, Daniel Sullivan, is former co-chair of Robinson & Cole's litigation section and chair of the firm's insurance and reinsurance practice group. He is a trial lawyer with more than 30 years of experience in complex commercial disputes, focused on insurance coverage and extra-contractual claims litigation. He has tried more than 25 cases to verdict, final judgment, or final arbitration decision, according to his biography.
Jonathan Small represents clients in complex commercial litigation for Robinson & Cole. He focuses on insurance coverage and bad-faith litigation, unfair business practices claims, professional liability, class actions and appeals. Small also represents clients in cases involving allegations of unfair business acts or practices and professional liability, and maintains an active pro bono practice.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
State High Court Adopts Modern Standard for Who Keeps $70K Engagement Ring After Breakup
Trending Stories
- 1The Corporate Transparency Act: One Year Later With Deadline Looming
- 2Getting Cameras in Federal Courts Will Take More than Logic
- 3Emerson Electric Opens Wallet to Reward New CLO for Fast Start
- 4Kirkland Hires Real Estate Finance Partners in New York
- 5Delaware Governor Names Magistrate Judge as Next Vice Chancellor
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250