Attorneys Beware: Cost-Conscious Clients Think They're Better Off Without Lawyers
Connecticut Bar Association President Ndidi Moses plans on implementing focus groups across the state to look at issues such as the cost of legal services, billable hours and low bar exam pass rates.
September 06, 2019 at 01:17 PM
3 minute read
A flood of clients challenging attorney billing rates is prompting the Connecticut Bar Association's new president, Ndidi Moses, to plan a major undertaking: focus groups to go across the state and look into issues, including the cost of legal services, pro se representation and the low bar examination pass rate.
"Corporations and individuals are finding ways around hiring lawyers," Moses said. "They are either going pro se, or are using alternative legal services as there are organizations and companies that provide legal services but are not law firms."
New Haven attorney Huge Keefe is familiar with such feedback.
"I've heard that since I started practicing 50 years ago," the partner with Lynch, Traub. Keefe & Errante said. "It seems now, though, to have really gained steam. It will happen, if that is what corporations want. They sign the checks."
It's been 14 years since the bar conducted a comprehensive study of legal costs and other metrics affecting the changing attitudes, and Moses said all signs point to a need for a self-evaluation.
"The last report, back in 2004-2005, was done because of changing market trends," she said. "Since the last report, there is a rising pro se docket that the court's can't handle, the cost of legal services has increased tremendously, and the public's perception of the importance of the assistance of lawyers has declined."
Focus groups will include law school academics, judges, attorneys and community stakeholders, who will begin meeting throughout the state in the fall to consider potential changes.
Billable hours and the high cost of legal services are key concerns.
"We are hearing a lot of corporations saying that if outside counsel can't rein in the costs, then they will do it in-house or hire alternative legal services, who can do it for less," said Moses, a prosecutor with the U.S. Attorney's Office in Bridgeport. "The public is getting frustrated and corporations are getting frustrated. Everyone is looking for a solution, and we need to work with them to find it."
As part of the focus group initiative related to pro se individuals, Moses said bar association members will also be doing library tours throughout the state talking about the importance of hiring an attorney.
"Many people think they do not need a lawyer, when they really do," she said. "Online resources tend to give people a false sense of security in that they can be their own lawyer."
The focus groups will also address the declining pass rates among candidates taking the bar exam in Connecticut, and offer recommendations on how to improve those numbers.
"We want to look at why the pass rates are dropping," Moses said. "What are we missing and what's going on here?"
Results from the February 2019 Connecticut bar examinations show that the pass rate fell to less than 50%, The numbers for July in Connecticut have also dropped in the past few years.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Litera Acquires Document Automation Startup Offices & Dragons
- 2Patent Trolls Come Under Increasing Fire in Federal Courts
- 3Transforming Dispute Processes in Law: The Impact of Large Language Models
- 4Daniel Habib to Serve as Next Attorney-in-Charge of NY Federal Defender Appeals Unit
- 5Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege in the Modern Age of Communications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250