New York, Connecticut Pursue Claims as Purdue Pharma Settles With 2,000 Local Governments
In the wake of news of a tentative settlement between Purdue Pharma and about 2,000 local governments, New York and Connecticut said they plan to continue to press their litigation against the drug manufacturer.
September 11, 2019 at 04:44 PM
3 minute read
Connecticut and New York attorneys general made it clear Wednesday they are not ready to settle their litigation against Purdue Pharma over the nation's opioid addiction crisis.
Their comments came after the Associated Press Wednesday reported attorneys representing about 2,000 local governments across the country had agreed to a tentative settlement with the pharmaceutical giant and maker of OxyContin. Details of the settlement were not immediately available.
Connecticut Attorney General William Tong was quick to respond to the news.
"I cannot speak to other states or divulge confidential negotiations, but Connecticut has not agreed to any settlement," he said. "Our position remains firm and unchanged, and nothing for us has changed today."
Tong is among attorneys general spearheading a lawsuit against the Stamford, Connecticut-based company and its owners, the Sackler family.
"The scope and scale of the pain, death and destruction that Purdue and the Sacklers have caused far exceeds anything that has been offered thus far," Tong said. "Connecticut's focus is on the victims and their families, and holding Purdue and the Sacklers accountable for the crisis they have caused. I cannot predict whether Purdue will seek bankruptcy, but all I can say is we are ready to aggressively pursue this case wherever it goes, whether it is in the Connecticut courts or through bankruptcy."
New York Attorney General Letitia James agreed.
"A deal that doesn't account for the depth and pain and destruction caused by Purdue and the Sacklers is an insult—plain and simple," James said in a statement.
Purdue released a statement saying the company was working to alleviate opioid addiction.
"Purdue Pharma continues to work with all plaintiffs on reaching a comprehensive resolution to its opioid litigation that will deliver billions of dollars and vital opioid overdose rescue medicines to communities across the country impacted by the opioid crisis," it said.
News of Wednesday's tentative agreement comes on the heels of an Ohio settlement conference meeting that Tong and fellow attorneys general held in August. At the time, an NBC news report said the company was looking to offer between $10 billion and $12 billion to settle claims.
Tong has strongly criticized Purdue Pharma. His office filed an amended 62-page lawsuit against the company and individual members of the Sackler family related to the alleged fraudulent fund transfers from the company. Following an investigation in 2007, several Purdue executives pleaded guilty to charges they had misled the public about the risks of OxyContin.
Tong and his court pleadings have claimed the Big Pharma company intentionally misled consumers of the dangers of its product through a marketing scheme, a claim the company has denied.
Related stories:
Tong Considers Settlement With Purdue Pharma Over Opioid Crisis
High-Risk 'Nuisance' Strategy Employed Against Opioid Makers
Meet 4 Women Helping Connecticut Sue Big Pharma Over Opioid Addiction
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Administration Faces Legal Challenge Over EO Impacting Federal Workers
3 minute readSettlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 15th Circuit Considers Challenge to Louisiana's Ten Commandments Law
- 2Crocs Accused of Padding Revenue With Channel-Stuffing HEYDUDE Shoes
- 3E-discovery Practitioners Are Racing to Adapt to Social Media’s Evolving Landscape
- 4The Law Firm Disrupted: For Office Policies, Big Law Has Its Ear to the Market, Not to Trump
- 5FTC Finalizes Child Online Privacy Rule Updates, But Ferguson Eyes Further Changes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250