Connecticut's Bar Exam Pass Rate Jumps 5 Percentage Points
The July 2019 pass rate for the bar exam hit 60%, or about 5 percentage points higher than the year before, still considerably lower than the traditional July pass rate of about 70%.
September 27, 2019 at 06:21 PM
4 minute read
The percentage of test takers passing Connecticut's July bar exam increased slightly to 60% this year, up from 55% a year ago.
The number, though, is still lower than the pass rate in most years over the past decade, which typically hovered around 70%.
The statistics for July 2019 were released Friday afternoon. They shows 182 out of 303 candidates passed.
The pass rate for first-time test takers also increased from the previous year, inching to 73%, up from 70%.
Among the two colleges with the highest numbers of test takers, one saw a dramatic improvement from the previous year, while the other dipped.
At the University of Connecticut School of Law, which had the most candidates, the overall pass rate zoomed to 76% in July, up from 59% one year earlier. Sixty-five of its 86 candidates passed the bar exam. Meanwhile, 82% of the university's first-time test takers succeeded, compared with 68% in July 2018.
But for Quinnipiac University School of Law, which had the second-largest group of test takers, the results were worse than last year's. The university fell to an overall pass rate of 62%, down from 76% in 2018, as 41 of its 66 candidates passed. Among its first-time test takers, 73% succeeded, compared with 82% one year earlier.
Western New England University in Springfield, Massachusetts, went from a pass rate of 28% in July 2018 to 20%, with six of 39 people passing in 2019.
Yale University Law School students continued their perfect streak for the second year in a row. All of its eight candidates succeeded, just as the five who sat had done in July 2018.
|UConn's winning formula
University of Connecticut School of Law dean Timothy Fisher told the Connecticut Law Tribune Friday that "the meaningful numbers for me are the first-time test takers, because those are the people we had access to and that we were working with this year."
Fisher attributes the improved performance to several factors.
"We did a lot in terms of curriculum here. We have a full-time academic support faculty member who started in that role in 2018," he said.
That faculty member, Mary Beattie, "works with every student who wants extra help on the bar exam," Fisher said. "She also teaches a course on specifically taking the bar exam, and teaches how to understand the writing on the bar exam and the methodology of it."
A recent hire, adjunct professor Samuel Farkas, teaches a new online bar-preparation course for credit, and the university covers the costs. The course, Fisher said, focuses on the bar exam's subject matter and multiple choice section.
John Morgan, a spokesman for Quinnipiac, referred inquiries to interim dean Brad Saxton, who could not be reached by press time.
Connecticut Bar Examining Committee administrative director Jessica Kallipolites told the Connecticut Law Tribune, "We were all hopeful the numbers would go up. If it had gone below 55%, we would have been surprised. I do hope that last year was an aberration."
With the exception of a policy implemented two years ago to allow test takers with law degrees outside the country to take the bar exam here, Kallipolites said "there is nothing to pinpoint to say why the numbers" have gone below 70% for July's exam in the last two years.
Three of nine, or 33%, of the foreign students who took the test this July passed.
See the full results here:
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readClass Action Lawsuit Targets 40 Private Colleges and Universities Over Alleged Price-Fixing
3 minute readFederal Judge Blocks New Hampshire Law Banning Transgender Girls From School Sports
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Growing PFAS Morass: Why Insurance Should Cover These Products Liability Claims
- 2Dallas Jury Awards $98.65M in Botham Jean Killing by Dallas Officer
- 3In Talc Bankruptcy, Andy Birchfield Skipped His Deposition. Could He Face Sanctions?
- 4Pharmaceutical Patents: Benefits and Challenges
- 5Where Do Web-Tracking Class Actions Belong? 8th Circuit Weighs the Issue
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250