Trump-Ukraine Whistleblower Has Raised $138,000 on GoFundMe
The whistleblower who accused President Donald Trump of pressuring Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden isn't paying his legal team, although a nonprofit has raised $138,000 for the whistleblower's legal costs.
September 27, 2019 at 04:25 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
The anonymous whistleblower who has accused President Donald Trump of pressuring Ukraine's president to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden is not paying a dime for a high-quality team of lawyers who specialize in government-whistleblower cases.
The team of attorneys are working pro bono, which means the client won't have to cover their fees.
"It was the right thing to do," said one of the lawyers, Mark Zaid, managing partner in Mark S. Zaid in Washington, D.C., who's working alongside Andrew Bakaj and Charles "Chuck" McCullough, both of Compass Rose Legal Group.
Zaid added that the team will get compensation from Whistleblower Aid, a nonprofit that raises funds to assist whistleblowers with legal costs and other expenses. Whistleblower Aid has launched a GoFundMe campaign that raised nearly $138,000 in the past couple of days to pay the whistleblower's legal costs.
"One of our key objectives now is to ensure the anonymity of the whistleblower," Zaid said, noting he hopes the source's identity never comes out, even if the person testifies before Congress about the complaint.
Zaid said it's vitally important for government whistleblowers who disclose misconduct or abuse dealing with national security information to follow the proper procedures to file a whistleblower complaint, because otherwise, they face criminal liability.
For example, leaking classified information to the news media has landed past whistleblowers such as Reality Winner and Chelsea Manning in federal prison.
"The key, especially in the national security world, is to make sure the person dots their i's and crosses their t's so there is no mistake made that would enable the government to reprise against the individual because they lack protection," Zaid said.
He said he doesn't expect the whistleblower to face any criminal troubles because the person followed the law to disclose the claim about Trump.
Even if the threat of criminal prosecution is absent here, whistleblowers often face consequences at work or home after they make their disclosures. They often face retaliation at work, which can be lessened if they're willing to leave that job.
"I'm always fearful for any of my whistleblower clients, but if they follow the law and the whistleblower is hopefully represented by a lawyer who is well-connected, then we have a better chance to protect them," Zaid said.
He said he's worked with many high-profile whistleblowers, but none who raised claims against a president.
When asked if this is his biggest whistleblower case so far, Zaid replied, "By way of potential impact, I can't imagine how to say no to that."
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute read'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250