New Haven Lawyer Apologizes, But Opposing Counsel Wants Sanctions
Gretchen Randall, an attorney with New Haven's Neubert, Pepe & Monteith, has apologized to the court in a letter to the judge who announced she would be referring her to the Statewide Grievance Committee.
September 30, 2019 at 12:36 PM
4 minute read
A New Haven attorney who raised the ire of a Superior Court judge, who referred her to the Statewide Grievance Committee, has responded in writing, saying any mistakes she made in not disclosing discovery information to the plaintiff wasn't intentional.
But opposing counsel called the letter inappropriate, and asked the court to disregard it.
That two-page apology letter came from Neubert, Pepe & Monteith attorney Gretchen Randall. It is addressed to plaintiff attorney Ed Gasser and Hartford Superior Court Judge Susan Quinn Cobb, who referred Randall to disciplinary authorities for providing inaccurate interrogatories to plaintiff counsel in a premises liability slip-and-fall case.
"I begin with an apology to the court and to counsel for my neglect in not disclosing the email message in my client's responses to plaintiff's discovery requests," Randal wrote. "I failed to consider whether the email message was a report or statement subject to disclosure. I now realize that my review of the available records was not complete. While I readily acknowledge that I made a mistake, I also wish to stress that I did not intentionally withhold material I believed was subject to disclosure."
But opposing counsel filed an objection the following day to Randall's correspondence.
In it, Gasser called Randall's letter and explanation of events "wholly inappropriate particularly when the court, honorable Judge Cobb, has recused itself from the matter." Gasser also wrote that Randall's letter "furthers the position that the conduct of counsel was a 'mistake,' as opposed to the conscious decision to conceal the content of the reporting."
|Click here to read Gasser's objection, beginning on page 1, and Randall's letter, from page 4.
The filings followed the judge's Sept. 18 rebuke of Randall, during which the judge also ordered a mistrial, and said she had an "obligation" to refer the defense attorney to the grievance committee.
"Doing this gives me no pleasure, but not doing anything is not an option as it sends the wrong message to counsel, to her firm, and to other counsel practicing in the state, that filling out interrogatory forms in this manner is not appropriate," the judge wrote.
Randall specializes in medical malpractice, hospital liability, professional malpractice and insurance defense. She represented defendants Eastern Connecticut Health Network Inc. and Prospect Manchester Hospital Inc. in a suit by MaryAnn Price, who alleges she fell and suffered injuries on a broken section of a cement walkway.
Both Gasser and the judge asked why Randall never mentioned the existence of a video of the fall in her discovery papers to the plaintiff. That video no longer exists due to a changeover in the hospital's camera systems. But the court said Randall had a duty to disclose the video's existence.
Gasser requested sanctions.
In the letter that followed the judge's disciplinary referral, Randall wrote, "Again, I apologize to the court and to counsel for the late disclosure, and I assure the court that I will not forget the lesson I have learned in recognizing my mistake."
After opposing counsel objected to the letter, Randall's managing partner Mike Neubert filed a response in court.
"Attorney Randall's sole purpose in communicating with the court and plaintiff's counsel by letter was to extend her apologies for the late production of the information at issue, and to advise the court and plaintiff's counsel of certain measures she and her firm are willing to undertake in order to address any remaining concerns plaintiff may have about the completeness of disclosure in this action," Neubert wrote.
Randall referred all comment Monday to Neubert, who said, "Because this matter is still in litigation, it's inappropriate to comment. But we are confident attorney Randall did not breach any of her professional obligations."
Gasser declined to comment.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Severe Emotional Distress': DC Judge Finds Iran Liable in 3 US Hostage-Takings
2 minute read'You Are Not Alone': 120 Sex Assault Victims Plan to Sue Sean 'Diddy' Combs
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft and Pryor Cashman have entered appearances for Diageo Americas Supply d/b/a Ciroc Distilling Co. and Sony Songs, a division of Sony Music Publishing, respectively, in a pending lawsuit. The case was filed Sept. 10 in New York Southern District Court by the Bloom Firm and IP Legal Studio on behalf of Dawn Angelique Richard. The plaintiff, who performed as a member of producer Sean 'Diddy' Combs girl group Danity Kane and later his band, Diddy - Dirty Money, claims that she was financially exploited by Combs and subjected to inhumane working conditions. Among other violations, Richard claims that Combs required group members to remain at his residences and studios, deprived them of adequate food and sleep and forced them to rehearse for 36 to 48 hours without breaks. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla, is 1:24-cv-06848, Richard v. Combs et al.
Who Got The Work
Mathilda McGee-Tubb and Kevin M. McGinty of Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, as well as Jesse W. Belcher-Timme of Doherty, Wallace, Pillsbury & Murphy, have stepped in to defend Peter Pan Bus Lines in a pending consumer class action. The suit, filed Sept. 4 in Massachusetts District Court by Hackett Feinberg PC and KalielGold PLLC, accuses the defendant of charging undisclosed 'junk fees' on top of ticket prices during checkout. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Mark G. Mastroianni, is 3:24-cv-12277, Mulani et al v. Peter Pan Bus Lines, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250