71 Bridgeport Priests Molested 281 Children, Retired Judge Finds
Retired Judge Robert Holzberg found that 71 priests had abused 281 minors. Of these, a small group of 10 priests had amassed the majority of victims: 172 children, or 61%.
October 01, 2019 at 01:56 PM
4 minute read
Seventy-one priests sexually abused 281 minors over the Bridgeport Diocese's 66-year history, according to retired Judge Robert Holzberg, who conducted an in-depth investigation of priest sexual abuse.
A small group—10 priests—abused the majority of these children, leaving 172 victims, or 61%.
Holzberg, now a partner at Pullman & Comley in Bridgeport, led a team of attorneys and investigators to analyze more than 250,000 papers and electronic records. He released his findings Tuesday during an hourlong press conference with Bishop Frank Caggiano.
A major takeaway: Two former bishops, Walter Curtis and Edward Egan, who have both since died, contributed to the problem through administrative failures from 1961-2000.
"The administrations suffered from significant handicaps," Holzberg told reporters. "There was a failure of attitude and misplaced priorities."
The former bishops failed to move to remove priests who had abused minors and "repeatedly ignored warning signs and red flags," Holzberg said.
"There was a lack of compassion and support for survivors, and often they showed hostility toward them," he added.
Caggiano, the current diocese leader, apologized and used the word "evil" on at least three occasions in talking about the priests' sexual abuse of children.
"They were evil and crimes of abuse of minors," he said. "The wounds will take a long time to heal. I am deeply sorry for that betrayal."
Caggiano told victims, "We will accompany you on any road to healing."
Prolific abusers
The statistics were alarming, Holzberg said.
"This is a horrific story," he said.
But the former judge also pointed to a "fundamental shift" in the diocese's actions, and the work by its last two bishops, Caggiano and William Lori.
"Their attitudes stand in deep contrast to Bishops Egan and Curtis," Holzberg said.
Moving forward, Holzberg recommends, among other things, that the church commit to training, strictly enforce a zero-tolerance policy regarding child sexual abuse, have a neutral third party look at sex abuse allegations in the diocese, and continue to reach out to survivors.
The diocese said it had paid $52.5 million in settlements for 156 claims since 1953. It tapped Holzberg in October 2018 to head an independent accountability investigation into allegations that clergy were sexually abusing parishioners going back decades.
At the time, Holzberg told the Connecticut Law Tribune he received a commitment from Caggiano that nothing would be off-limits. He reiterated Tuesday that he told Caggiano at the start of the investigation that "the report will not play favorites," and that the investigation would be "thorough, accurate and honest." Caggiano agreed to give the team all the resources needed to conduct the investigation, Holzberg said.
Holzberg's law career dates back to 1978, and he has since been a practicing attorney, Superior Court judge and law professor. He said he had unlimited access to all of the diocese archives and files since 1953, the year the Diocese of Bridgeport spun off from the Hartford Diocese.
Before retiring from the bench in 2012 after more than 22 years, Holzberg successfully mediated claims against St. Francis Hospital in Hartford involving allegations of decadeslong sexual abuse of minors at the hands of a hospital employee. And in 2014, the Stamford corporation counsel retained him to lead an investigation into allegations that a Stamford Board of Education high school teacher was involved in a sexual relationship with her student.
Holzberg leads the alternative dispute resolution practice at Pullman & Comley. He is a mediator and arbitrator in civil matters in state and federal court, including personal injury, employment, construction, environmental, probate, insurance, intellectual property, and commercial disputes.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKnowledge Is Power: Tips From Nuclear Award Winners; and UConn Law Tackles Hate
4 minute readRoad Trip: Law.com Pro Mid-Market Road Show Coming to Boston, And You're Invited
'Everybody Needs to Pay Attention': 10 Years After Sandy Hook, Gun-Control Litigation Takes Center Stage
5 minute read'A Legion of Lady Lawyers' to Gather in DC to Support Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Hit by Mail Truck: Man Agrees to $1.85M Settlement for Spinal Injuries
- 2Anticipating a New Era of 'Extreme Vetting,' Big Law Immigration Attys Prep for Demand Surge
- 3Deal Watch: What Dealmakers Are Thankful for in 2024
- 4'The Court Will Take Action': Judge Upbraids Combative Rudy Giuliani During Outburst at Hearing
- 5Attorney Sanctioned for Not Exercising Ordinary Care: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250