Judge Mark Taylor's Stint in Apartheid South Africa Led Him to Bench
Judge Mark Taylor said living in South Africa for a year as a teenager had a major impact on him becoming an attorney and later a judge in Connecticut.
October 02, 2019 at 11:55 AM
4 minute read
Judge Mark Taylor is entering his 17th year on the bench and has worked in the civil, family and criminal divisions.
But if it wasn't for a one-year stay in South Africa when he was 14 years old, his professional life might have turned out differently.
"There is a good chance I'd be doing something else today," the 64-year-old jurist said.
Taylor, his parents and three siblings, moved to Johannesburg for about one year in 1969-1970, because Taylor's father Kenneth had a sabbatical at his job with the World Council of Churches.
That experience, Taylor said, was not only eye-opening and depressing, but also led him to take a civil liberties course at Drew University. It sparked his interest in wanting to become an attorney, and Taylor eventually got his law degree in 1983 from the University of Connecticut School of Law.
"I saw firsthand a massive denial, a systematic denial, for the black population," said Taylor, who is white. "In that context, I saw the denial of civil liberties, which is why I took the civil liberties course in college. That course talked about what the U.S. Constitution stood for and that connected to me."
That year-plus stint in South Africa changed Taylor's life. It taught the young man that there was no equal protection and due process for most of the population, and made him realize the importance of justice and working in the legal profession.
"There were places where whites lived and where Africans, who were not white, lived. It was deplorable," he said. "I did write about apartheid in my English class as a teen in Johannesburg. They did not like it, and I was caned."
Taylor would later work briefly in private practice before spending 18 years in the Connecticut Legislature, including as chief legal counsel to Senate Democrats, and then 16 years on the bench.
"I came to understand and appreciate, later in my life, how critically important an independent and unbiased judiciary is to us at home, by providing the opportunity for individual justice under the law," Taylor told the Connecticut Law Tribune Wednesday.
Looking back at his years on the bench, Taylor said he got the most satisfaction out of presiding over civil cases, as opposed to criminal and family.
"There are complicated legal problems in criminal and family, but I find more diverse legal issues in civil," he said. "I like engaging about them, thinking about them and resolving them."
Some of the more difficult civil cases, Taylor said, revolve around foreclosures.
"In the end you end up having to remove people from their home and, sometimes, the alternative is not pleasant," Taylor said. "It's not easy, but I try to do it as humanely as possible. You give people enough time to move out and to make sure they have a plan; hopefully, they have a plan."
Judge Linda Lager, a senior jurist doing complex litigation docket work in Waterbury, has known Taylor the better part of 15 years.
"Judge Taylor is a compassionate, thoughtful and empathetic person, and as a judge, he is thoughtful and well-prepared," Lager said Wednesday. "He has the highest of integrity, and approaches his job with an open mind and with a respect for the law and the litigants appearing before him."
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250