UPDATE: Calhoun Named in Sex-Discrimination Lawsuit
Plaintiff Jaclyn Piscitelli filed suit Wednesday morning in federal court in Connecticut against the University of St. Joseph.
October 09, 2019 at 12:52 PM
4 minute read
Former University of Connecticut men's basketball coach Jim Calhoun has been named in a Title IX discrimination suit filed on behalf of the former associate athletic director at the University of St. Joseph.
Plaintiff Jaclyn Piscitelli filed the suit Wednesday morning in federal court in Connecticut against St. Joseph, where Calhoun has worked since September 2018. Calhoun's former employer, the University of Connecticut, is not part of the litigation. St. Joseph is the only defendant.
The plaintiff alleges Calhoun and others belittled her in what she says was a male-dominated and hostile environment with rampant "disdain" for women.
Piscitelli, who was fired from St. Joseph on June 21, alleged Calhoun leveled several inappropriate comments at her. She alleged Calhoun made her open the door for him even though he had keys, forced her to clean up coffee cups he had dropped and stepped on, and said his wife would have cleaned them, if he were at home.
No attorney had entered an appearance for Calhoun by press time.
The person who answered the phone in the athletic department at St. Joseph said the coach was in a meeting and unavailable for comment.
University spokeswoman Diana Sousa said the school was reviewing the lawsuit.
"The University of Saint Joseph takes compliance with all matters relating to Title IX very seriously," Sousa wrote in an email. "The University does not comment on pending litigation."
'You're certainly hot'
Piscitelli's complaint claimed the coach commented on her sexual attractiveness by telling her "Well, you're certainly hot."
She also alleged Calhoun disparaged another female employee by calling her demeaning names.
The lawsuit stated that before the 2018-19 academic year St. Joseph's intercollegiate athletic program was comprised exclusively of women's sports teams. The transition to a co-educational sports program meant new hires such as Calhoun for the new men's teams.
The complaint alleged the university gave Calhoun and his team preferential treatment, and diverted resources from women's sports to do so. It also claimed the school allowed Calhoun and assistant basketball coach Glen Miller to mistreat others.
Piscitelli alleged that on one occasion, Miller referenced dating app Tinder to insult her.
"I'd swipe left," the complaint quotes Miller as having told Piscitelli, a nod to a Tinder feature that allows users to reject a romantic match.
"Defendant permitted Calhoun and Miller to transform the work environment in the athletic department to one that was openly hostile and disdainful toward women, and where women were treated as second-class citizens," the complaint alleged.
Piscitelli claimed she complained about Calhoun and Miller to university athletic director Bill Cardarelli, but "no action was taken." She allegedly considered reporting Miller's Tinder comment to the university's human resources department, "but feared retaliation, particularly given Miller's affiliation with Calhoun, who was favored and fawned over by defendant's administrators because of his celebrity status."
Cardarelli did not respond to a request for comment Wednesday.
The suit alleged that when university officials told Piscitelli they were letting her go, she asked if she had done anything wrong. The suit claimed they told her she had not, but that the school was "moving in a new direction."
Representing Piscitelli are Magdalena Wiktor and Jacques Parenteau of New London-based Madsen, Prestley & Parenteau.
"Jackie Piscitelli had a job she loved and excelled at in an environment in which she generally felt respected and valued as a professional," Wiktor wrote in an email Wednesday. "However, that work environment was swiftly and drastically transformed into one that was hostile and demeaning toward women, once Jim Calhoun and Glen Miller joined the staff of USJ athletics. Rather than protecting Jackie and her female colleagues from further harassment and discrimination, USJ not only condoned this 'boys' club,' it fired Jackie in retaliation for daring to speak out against it."
Plaintiff counsel said the school can expect more litigation.
In addition to the Title IX retaliation lawsuit, they plan to file charges with the Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, alleging sex discrimination and retaliation in violation of state and federal law.
The federal lawsuit seeks compensatory damages, back pay and reinstatement, compensatory damages, punitive damages and attorney fees.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
State High Court Adopts Modern Standard for Who Keeps $70K Engagement Ring After Breakup
Trending Stories
- 1Attorneys ‘On the Move’: Morrison Cohen Adds White Collar Partner; Corporate/Securities Partner Joins Olshan
- 2Jury Says $118M: Netlist Wins Another Patent Verdict Against Samsung
- 3Big Law Communications, Media Attorneys Brace For Changes Under Trump
- 4Will England Accept that Digital Assets Are ‘Property’?
- 5Congress and Courts Are Considering Litigation Financing: Is Disclosure Imminent?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250