Tong Sues US Government for 'Singling Out' Connecticut Pardons
"This is not about any one individual case," Tong spokeswoman Elizabeth Benton said Friday. "It's about the legitimacy of Connecticut's pardon process."
October 11, 2019 at 12:33 PM
3 minute read
Connecticut Attorney General William Tong has sued five U.S. government agencies in federal court, alleging they're "singling Connecticut out" by rejecting the state's pardon of criminal defendants.
In a 25-page lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut, Tong raised constitutional and sovereignty issues. He claimed the state is the only one in the country where U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement doesn't recognize the pardon system.
"This is not about any one individual case," Tong spokeswoman Elizabeth Benton said Friday. "It's about the legitimacy of Connecticut's pardon process."
The federal government says it only acknowledges pardons handed down directly from governors. But Connecticut is one of six states—along with Alabama, Georgia, Idaho, South Carolina and Utah—that use a governor-appointed commission instead.
Tong alleges the federal government accepts pardons from five of these states, but not Connecticut.
"By irrationally singling Connecticut out from among its 49 sister states without showing any need, defendants have violated the constitutional principle of equal sovereignty," the lawsuit states. "Defendants have abruptly abandoned 66 years of settled practice, and singled-out Connecticut's government, law, and residents for deeply unequal and prejudicial treatment in the nation's immigration system."
The suit names ICE, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, the U.S. Department of Justice, and the Executive Office for Immigration Review as defendants. The Justice Department declined to comment, and no one from the other agencies responded.
The lawsuit alleges the federal government had previously accepted Connecticut's pardons, but seemed to change direction in 2018, with the case of defendant Richard Thompson.
Thompson is a lawful permanent Connecticut resident who moved to the U.S. from Jamaica at 17 years old. Connecticut gave him a complete pardon for his role in a second-degree assault after a bar fight, but ICE detained him for deportation.
Another case has also come into the spotlight, involving England native Wayzaro Walton, who ICE detained in Massachusetts. The federal government is seeking to deport Walton to England over several crimes she committed in Connecticut, but for which she received a full pardon.
Tong's lawsuit seeks declaratory and injunctive relief. Among other things, it seeks that the court "hold unlawful, vacate, and set aside defendant's practice of disregarding the efficacy and impact of Connecticut's pardons under the Pardon Waiver Claim."
The matter is scheduled for a hearing before Judge Vanessa Bryant.
Related stories:
'A Tragedy and a Nightmare': Connecticut Resident Remains Detained
2nd Circuit Showdown Scheduled Over Walton Deportation
Connecticut's Heavy Hitters Go to Bat in Bid to Stop Wayzaro Walton's Deportation
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
Patent Disputes Over SharkNinja, Dyson Products Nearing Resolution
Trending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250