'Human Decency Should Prevail Here': Wayzaro Walton Issued Stay 2 Days Before Deportation to England
Just 48 hours before Wayzaro Walton was scheduled to be deported back to her native England, the Board of Immigration Appeals stayed her deportation. Walton was pardoned by Connecticut for various criminal offenses, but the federal government doesn't recognize the state's pardon system.
October 16, 2019 at 04:32 PM
3 minute read
Connecticut's top elected leaders are applauding Tuesday afternoon's decision that the federal Board of Immigration Appeals had stayed the deportation of Wayzaro Walton back to her native country, the United Kingdom.
Elizabeth Benton, spokeswoman for Attorney General William Tong, said Wednesday the board will now consider the merits of Walton's case.
Walton's attorney, Erin O'Neil-Baker, who works for the Hartford Legal Group, told the Connecticut Law Tribune Wednesday that Walton had been expected to be deported Thursday.
"When she learned there was a stay, she was screaming and running around the facility [New Hampshire federal detention center] with happiness," O'Neil-Baker said. "We were all thrilled with joy and tears."
Gov. Ned Lamont said in a press release that "Human decency should prevail here. I am glad that she will have an opportunity for her case to be heard in a court of law. She is a legal resident of our state who should be back with her family and have the opportunity to contribute positively to our community."
Walton, a Hartford resident, was moved last week from a Boston-based detention center to one a little more north in New Hampshire. She has been in detention at the orders of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement since late March.
Walton's supporters continue to try all legal avenues to allow her to stay in this country. It's not clear when Walton, who the federal government is seeking to deport for felony shoplifting and five misdemeanor convictions, will be allowed to the leave the federal detention center. Walton came to the United States from England when she was 4 years old.
A gubernatorial-appointed board pardoned Walton, 35. But ICE only recognizes pardons that come directly from a state governor.
Tong, who filed sued last week against five U.S. government agencies in federal court, alleges the government is "singling Connecticut out" in rejecting the state's pardons of criminal defendants. Tong raised constitutional and sovereignty issues.
A vocal critic of the Trump administration, Tong, via a press release, said, "I am tremendously relieved for Wayzaro Walton, her wife Tamika and their daughter who have endured unimaginable stress. This is a positive step, but merely the beginning of our fight to defend Connecticut's pardon process to ensure Wayzaro Walton and other Connecticut residents receive the relief under the Pardon Waiver Clause which they are entitled to by law."
In addition to Tong and Lamont, Connecticut Sens. Richard Blumenthal, Chris Murphy and Hartford Mayor Luke Bronin were among those advocating for Walton to remain in Connecticut.
O'Neil-Baker made a pitch to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit to intervene, but the three-judge panel ruled Sept. 19 it lacked jurisdiction.
The Board of Immigration Appeals is part of the U.S. Department of Justice. No one from the DOJ's office of public affairs responded to a request for comment Wednesday.
Related stories:
Tong Sues US Government for 'Singling Out' Connecticut Pardons
'A Tragedy and a Nightmare': Connecticut Resident Remains Detained
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
Patent Disputes Over SharkNinja, Dyson Products Nearing Resolution
Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Trending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250