For the third time in less than two weeks a Connecticut university has been hit with a sexual misconduct or gender discrimination lawsuit.

The latest incident is a suit filed against Goodwin College Thursday in U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut on behalf of a former assistant professor of mathematics.

Plaintiff Laura Jean Champagne alleges a female student she was tutoring confided in her that a male professor promised good grades if the student became his mistress. That student alleged the professor also propositioned other female students, the lawsuit claims.

Champagne alleges she spoke to several college officials about the allegations, and that the school fired her for refusing to name the female student to human resources and other top university officials. She claimed the student had pleaded with her not to divulge her name.

Now, Champagne alleges her July 11 firing was a violation of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972.

The lawsuit is the latest in which Connecticut universities have been put in the spotlight for all the wrong reasons.

Last week, a female former associate athletic director sued the University of St. Joseph, claiming Hall of Fame men's basketball coach Jim Calhoun demeaned and harassed her. The suit also alleges other men harassed Jaclyn Piscitelli.

And this week, the Hartford Courant ran a Connecticut Mirror article that reported that documents released by Central Connecticut State University showed 10 cases over the last decade involving allegations of sexual misconduct against faculty and staff.

|

'Impossible spot'

With regard to Goodwin College, Champagne's attorney, Michael Reilly of Hartford-based Cicchiello & Cicchiello, told the Connecticut Law Tribune Friday his client was put in a difficult situation but she believes she did the right thing.

"Laura Champagne did not want to get fired, but she was placed in an impossible spot," Reilly said. "She'd have to either break someone's confidence, or get fired. They were two unappealing choices."

According to the lawsuit, Champagne met with several university officials, including staff from the human resources department. It alleges university officials asked Champagne to go back to the student and get permission to reveal her identity, but the student refused, and insisted on remaining anonymous.

Pressed several times by human resources and other university officials to reveal the student's identity, the lawsuit said Champagne declined, even though it allegedly damaged her standing at the school. At one point, the lawsuit alleges a human resources employee asked Champagne what the student would say "'if she knew you were going to lose your job,' or words to that effect." Champagne was fired soon after she declined to name the student, the lawsuit claims.

Reilly said the student never told Champagne the name of the professor who allegedly propositions female students. He said Title IX prohibits "any form of sexual harassment of students or staff or anyone really at institutes of higher learning that accept federal funds. The U.S. Supreme Court has found that, implicit in those protections, is protection against retaliation for anyone who makes a complaint or participates in an investigation of conduct that is prohibited by Title IX. My client fits into that category."

As of Friday, Goodwin College had not assigned an attorney to represent it in the litigation.

On Saturday, the college emailed the Connecticut Law Tribune the following statement: "We are not going to specifically comment on pending litigation, but the complaint is inaccurate, incomplete, and misleading. We believe this lawsuit has no merit and plan to defend against it vigorously."

The statement continued: "We can say, without reservation, that Goodwin College has a zero-tolerance policy regarding sexual harassment of any kind. This includes any person whose actions result in protecting the identity of an alleged predator. We have consistently demonstrated that Goodwin College is committed to doing everything in our power to ensure every student, faculty and staff member feels safe and secure."

The suit, which requests a jury trial, seeks attorney fees and unspecified monetary and punitive damages.

Judge Stefan Underhill is scheduled to hear the matter.

Related stories: