Meet Attorney Behind Victory for Sandy Hook Family in Wisconsin
Quarles & Brady partner Emily Feinstein joined the plaintiff's team when she read about the story of Leonard Pozner, a parent whose child died in the 2012 mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School.
October 22, 2019 at 06:04 PM
5 minute read
When Quarles & Brady partner Emily Feinstein read about Sandy Hook parent Leonard Pozner's lawsuit against Sandy Hook denier James Fetzer, she knew she wanted to be part of the case.
Feinstein, a Wisconsin attorney who has two small children, said she gets the dockets of lawsuits filed in Wisconsin, and the Pozner case intrigued her. What followed for Feinstein was something she said she never could have imagined: a defendant who said a mass murder never occurred; who doubted that grieving father Pozner was the real Leonard Pozner; and who said Pozner's son's death certificate was a fraud.
A Wisconsin jury saw things differently from Fetzer, a retired University of Minnesota at Duluth professor. It awarded Pozner $450,000 on Oct. 15 over conspiracy theories that are likely to have an impact in similar cases in Connecticut.
Fetzer and his attorney, Madison, Wisconsin-based Richard Bolton, have already said they will appeal. Bolton did not respond to requests for comment Tuesday.
Feinstein said the Sandy Hook mass shooting was "heartbreaking" for her, and she wanted to do anything she could to help Pozner, who sued for defamation over a book Fetzer co-authored, "Nobody Died at Sandy Hook."
"I had just come back from work after my second maternity leave when Sandy Hook happened," Feinstein said of the December 2012 massacre in which shooter Adam Lanza took the lives of 20 schoolchildren and six educators at Sandy Hook Elementary School. "There has always been a place in my heart for those families. When I saw what this poor father went through in bringing this lawsuit, I wanted to do what I could to help."
So Feinstein, pro bono coordinator for her firm, called up husband-and-wife Minneapolis attorneys Jake and Genevieve Zimmerman, asking if she could come on board, and offer her services free of charge. The Zimmermans agreed to collaborate with Feinstein and her colleagues Marisa Berlinger and Emily Steadman.
Feinstein, who picked the jury and argued motions in front of the judge, said the bizarre nature of the case soon became evident.
"At the first hearing in the case, Mr. Fetzer demanded that Mr. Pozner prove he was Mr. Pozner," the attorney said. "It was a scheduling conference, and we suspected he'd try these shenanigans. The judge said, 'No, it's not going to work.' I've never had another case like this."
|'Fake, forged or fabricated'
Since summary judgment was granted in June, the jury was only looking at how much to award Pozner. The strategy going in, Feinstein said, "was not to litigate whether the shooting happened, rather this was a narrowly tailored defamation case."
"We were just addressing four statements made by Mr. Fetzer," she said.
Among the alleged defamatory statements: three references in Fetzer's book and one in a blog post about the death certificate of 6-year-old Noah Pozner.
"He kept on saying the death certificate was fake, forged or fabricated," Feinstein said. "We hinged our case on that, and just needed to get the authentic copy of the death certificate."
But Feinstein said even that was not good enough for Fetzer, who claimed that since certain parts of the certificate appeared to be shaded, the document was fraudulent.
While Fetzer and Bolton tried to center the litigation around the First Amendment's free-speech protections, Feinstein argued otherwise.
"The First Amendment gives the right to free speech, but it doesn't give them the right to be free from responsibility for the effects of their speech," she said.
Feinstein applauded the jury's conclusion.
"It's the first case that went to verdict against these hoaxsters," she said. "It's incredibly validating that the jury gave significant damages against a relatively minor player like Mr. Fetzer."
Another surprise at trial: the emotions displayed.
"The jury was crying during opening statements," Feinstein said, "Then when Mr. Pozner testified, my goodness, the judge appeared to be crying. He wiped an eye or two."
Feinstein said Fetzer never made physical threats against Pozner, but those who read his book allegedly did.
"A woman who made threats against Mr. Pozner mentioned the book," Feinstein said. "That book has had a big impact on Mr. Pozner. When misinformation like that is out there, it's dangerous."
Pozner's case went to trial as other Sandy Hook families have brought a defamation suit against right-wing radio host and InfoWars star Alex Jones. That litigation is pending in Connecticut. Soon after the school shooting, Jones denied the massacre. He has since walked back those statements.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
State High Court Adopts Modern Standard for Who Keeps $70K Engagement Ring After Breakup
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250