The Cleaner: How Trustee Linda Hadley Steps In for Attorneys in Trouble
Attorney Linda Hadley outlined her involvement in taking over the cases of disciplined attorney David Chomick in an interview with the Connecticut Law Tribune.
October 25, 2019 at 02:46 PM
3 minute read
Attorney David Chomick, who was disciplined for accepting a retainer and then not doing the work, left behind ample files and upward of 30 clients when he was suspended for six months for not taking continuing legal education courses, as ordered.
It was left to West Hartford attorney Linda Hadley to come in and go behind the curtain of the Chomick case: to work with his clients to answer their questions; to put her name on his Interest on Lawyers Trust Account; and to make sure everything ran smoothly.
The Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel asked Hadley, a partner with Gfeller Laurie, to take over all of Chomick's files, some of which were voluminous. All the cases involved anxious clients, who had to be notified that their lawyer would no longer be representing them in the short term.
That role fell to Hadley, who quickly went to work.
In the case of disciplined attorney Chomick, Chief Disciplinary Counsel attorney LeAnne Larson asked Hadley to takeover and step into the nonpaying role of trustee.
"I thought it was something that was a duty to provide to the bar," Hadley said. "I've done pro bono work before, and when someone from the Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel asks you to do this, you feel like you have some obligation to give back."
It's a priceless contribution.
Chief Disciplinary Counsel Brian Staines said trustees such as Hadley "play a very important role in protecting clients of the deactivated attorney," which is why his office works to curb attorney missteps.
"The Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel participates in giving seminars on legal ethics throughout the year," Staines said. "And we request that attorneys volunteer for future appointments" as trustees.
The first thing Hadley did when she got the assignment was go to a local Webster Bank where Chomick had an IOLTA account. She switched the account from Chomick's name to hers, as trustee.
Then came the hard part: working with Chomick's clients, who were, for the most part, defendants in criminal proceedings.
Hadley, who will stay on as trustee until January 2020 when Chomick's suspension comes to an end, said she sent letters out to about 25 to 30 clients, and received calls from about one-third of them, who proceeded to pepper her with questions on their case.
"I had to explain to them that I was not representing them. I was just the trustee," Hadley said. "I fielded calls from some clients who just did not understand the process. Some wanted to know how long the suspension was, while others asked to see the court order, and others asked me whether they should seek new counsel."
It was also up to Hadley to contact the prosecutors in New Britain, where most of Chomick's case were, telling them that Chomick's clients would not have representation. In some cases, the matters were continued, while clients got new representation in others.
Hadley's practice includes representing small and large companies, financial institutions, and individual commercial and consumer litigation. She estimates she spent about 15 hours on the Chomick case.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDC Judge Rules Russia Not Immune in Ukrainian Arbitration Award Dispute
2 minute readRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
Trending Stories
- 1The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 2Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 3Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 4Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 5Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250