'He Had a Reputation': Ex-Bosses Discuss John Durham, Who's Heading Russia Probe
Connecticut-based U.S. Attorney John Durham's probe into the origins of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential elections will now be transitioned into a criminal investigation.
October 28, 2019 at 02:28 PM
4 minute read
As the investigation into the origins of Russian influence in the 2016 U.S. presidential election and the possible FBI and Justice Department misconduct has now evolved into a criminal investigation, all eyes turn to U.S. Attorney General William Barr's pick to lead the probe: longtime prosecutor Connecticut-based U.S. Attorney John Durham.
Durham is no novice to national and international investigations that have garnered lots of media sunlight.
And those who know him say the 69-year-old Republican is thorough, fair and resolute. They say he is his "own man," not likely to let outside pressures influence him.
"We know that is the case because we know who John is. John will not put his name on something unless he is confident of the final product," said Day Pitney partner Stan Twardy, who was U.S. attorney for Connecticut from 1985-1991, and Durham's boss as Durham served an assistant U.S. attorney. "He will not be influenced by Barr. If the president or the attorney general try to direct him in a way they wanted, rather than in a way the facts would lead John, he'd step away from the case."
Others who have worked with Durham echoed similar sentiments, saying they believe he's the right attorney to steer the investigation to avoid partisan influences in an increasingly polarized Washington, D.C.
"He's very much his own man," said longtime New Haven attorney and Jacobs & Dow partner William Dow III, who has known Durham since 1976. "He has the ability to know what the right thing is, and the determination to do the right thing without external influence."
Both Twardy and Dow said Durham's history speaks for itself, and strengthens his reputation as a no-nonsense first-rate prosecutor.
|
Related story: 5 Things to Know About U.S. Attorney John Durham
Durham, who began as lead federal prosecutor in Connecticut in February 2018, has prosecuted the Boston mob; led investigations into former Republican Connecticut Gov. John Rowland, who served two prison stints for corruption; and headed the U.S. Justice Department's investigation into the legality of the CIA's use of enhanced interrogation techniques.
"The national spotlight will not affect John because he's been there and done that," Twardy said Monday. "This is nothing new for John. From dealing with mobsters to the waterboarding investigation, he is a man of utmost integrity."
Twardy said Durham's reputation of fairness and being thorough was evident when Durham worked for him.
"He had a reputation back then as being a dogged investigator," Twardy said. "He was a brilliant courtroom attorney. He tried a lot of difficult cases, but he had unequaled success."
Twardy said he learned a lot from Durham during the time they worked together.
"He taught me about the best practices for an investigation," Twardy said. "He also does not like leaks. You never had leaks of substance from the Mueller investigation and this will be the same way. I saw it firsthand with him and I've seen it from afar. He plays everything close to the vest."
Shipman & Goodwin partner James Bergenn has tried numerous cases against Durham and negotiated several plea deals with him. Bergenn, a former public defender and longtime defense attorney, said Durham's current assignment "is very suitable to his background."
"Our experience in Connecticut is that he will follow the facts," Bergenn said. "He's fearless and he does not seek to win popularity contests."
Tom Carson, Durham's spokesperson, said the office would have no comment on this story.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBREAKING: Biden Just Nominated This Lawyer for US Attorney for Connecticut
3 minute readLawyers Are Talking About Sen. Blumenthal's Call to Study Breaking Up Eversource Energy
4 minute read$1.7M Game Changer: Inside Pivotal Moment That Shifted Odds for Police Officer Suing CCSU Over Rape
4 minute readCOVID-19 Slowed Them, But Disgruntled Clients Filed Hundreds of Complaints Against Connecticut Lawyers
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How to Support Law Firm Profitability: Train Partners Up
- 2Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 3Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 4Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 5X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250