'He Had a Reputation': Ex-Bosses Discuss John Durham, Who's Heading Russia Probe
Connecticut-based U.S. Attorney John Durham's probe into the origins of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential elections will now be transitioned into a criminal investigation.
October 28, 2019 at 02:28 PM
4 minute read
As the investigation into the origins of Russian influence in the 2016 U.S. presidential election and the possible FBI and Justice Department misconduct has now evolved into a criminal investigation, all eyes turn to U.S. Attorney General William Barr's pick to lead the probe: longtime prosecutor Connecticut-based U.S. Attorney John Durham.
Durham is no novice to national and international investigations that have garnered lots of media sunlight.
And those who know him say the 69-year-old Republican is thorough, fair and resolute. They say he is his "own man," not likely to let outside pressures influence him.
"We know that is the case because we know who John is. John will not put his name on something unless he is confident of the final product," said Day Pitney partner Stan Twardy, who was U.S. attorney for Connecticut from 1985-1991, and Durham's boss as Durham served an assistant U.S. attorney. "He will not be influenced by Barr. If the president or the attorney general try to direct him in a way they wanted, rather than in a way the facts would lead John, he'd step away from the case."
Others who have worked with Durham echoed similar sentiments, saying they believe he's the right attorney to steer the investigation to avoid partisan influences in an increasingly polarized Washington, D.C.
"He's very much his own man," said longtime New Haven attorney and Jacobs & Dow partner William Dow III, who has known Durham since 1976. "He has the ability to know what the right thing is, and the determination to do the right thing without external influence."
Both Twardy and Dow said Durham's history speaks for itself, and strengthens his reputation as a no-nonsense first-rate prosecutor.
Related story: 5 Things to Know About U.S. Attorney John Durham
Durham, who began as lead federal prosecutor in Connecticut in February 2018, has prosecuted the Boston mob; led investigations into former Republican Connecticut Gov. John Rowland, who served two prison stints for corruption; and headed the U.S. Justice Department's investigation into the legality of the CIA's use of enhanced interrogation techniques.
"The national spotlight will not affect John because he's been there and done that," Twardy said Monday. "This is nothing new for John. From dealing with mobsters to the waterboarding investigation, he is a man of utmost integrity."
Twardy said Durham's reputation of fairness and being thorough was evident when Durham worked for him.
"He had a reputation back then as being a dogged investigator," Twardy said. "He was a brilliant courtroom attorney. He tried a lot of difficult cases, but he had unequaled success."
Twardy said he learned a lot from Durham during the time they worked together.
"He taught me about the best practices for an investigation," Twardy said. "He also does not like leaks. You never had leaks of substance from the Mueller investigation and this will be the same way. I saw it firsthand with him and I've seen it from afar. He plays everything close to the vest."
Shipman & Goodwin partner James Bergenn has tried numerous cases against Durham and negotiated several plea deals with him. Bergenn, a former public defender and longtime defense attorney, said Durham's current assignment "is very suitable to his background."
"Our experience in Connecticut is that he will follow the facts," Bergenn said. "He's fearless and he does not seek to win popularity contests."
Tom Carson, Durham's spokesperson, said the office would have no comment on this story.
Related stories:
Review: Five Things to Know About U.S. Attorney John Durham
Trump Nominates John Durham as Next US Attorney for Connecticut
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBREAKING: Biden Just Nominated This Lawyer for US Attorney for Connecticut
3 minute readLawyers Are Talking About Sen. Blumenthal's Call to Study Breaking Up Eversource Energy
4 minute read$1.7M Game Changer: Inside Pivotal Moment That Shifted Odds for Police Officer Suing CCSU Over Rape
4 minute readCOVID-19 Slowed Them, But Disgruntled Clients Filed Hundreds of Complaints Against Connecticut Lawyers
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250