No Jerks Here: This Group of Lawyers Is Setting a High Bar for Civility in Profession
"Being a jerk in family law can lose you business," said solo practitioner Fred Hertz.
October 28, 2019 at 07:19 PM
5 minute read
In a high-stress, deadline-driven profession, lawyers are increasingly uncivil toward each other, legal experts say—except for one group: family law attorneys.
Incivility is so rampant in the profession, it's become a hot topic at legal conferences and discussions within the American Bar Association. But one group of lawyers seems to be getting it right.
"Being a jerk in family law can lose you business," said Oakland, California-based solo practitioner Fred Hertz.
The nature, sensitivity and sometimes lasting consequences of family law disputes make it essential for practitioners to keep a level head to counter their clients' often impassioned states.
"In family law, there are some lawyers who work very hard to have a more collaborative, problem-solving approach," said Leslie Levin, University of Connecticut School of Law professor. "In personal injury cases, lawyers can be more contentious."
|'Pattern of Being Unhelpful'
Hertz, a family law attorney who has also worked in civil law, agreed.
"I've seen both sides, and there is a dramatic difference," he said.
Another reason for these lawyers' politeness and consideration: Family law is an especially close-knit practice area, with attorneys typically socializing in small circles, and often encountering each other daily in professional settings, Hertz said. They're unlike other groups that might never see opposing counsel again.
"There is a culture of shunning of lawyers in family law that are considered uncivil," Hertz said. "People won't make referrals to them."
In other words, being less civil in family law "could affect an attorney's bottom line," he added.
This creates a different culture than in other practice areas, where rather than hurting business, aggression among litigators can create an advantage.
"In personal injury law, there is a sense that the other side is the enemy," said Hertz, who's been an attorney for 37 years. "Personal injury plaintiffs and defense counsel are often in camps. There is a belief that being difficult in personal injury law is helpful to a client. For example, an attorney not turning over documents, not returning phone calls, or not showing up for a meeting" with opposing counsel.
Hertz, who is also a mediator, said he's seen in his mediation work that "lots of commercial and personal injury attorneys are consistently inconsiderate."
"They have a pattern of being unhelpful," he said.
|In Defense of PI Lawyers
Personal injury lawyers applaud the congeniality of family law attorneys, but suggest a comparison of the two practice areas requires more context.
Longtime New London-based personal injury attorney Robert Reardon, for instance, says there is truth to the criticism, but much of the contentiousness on the part of personal injury lawyers can be traced to changes to the system in which they practice.
"There is extensive discovery that is largely unnecessary by the defense in personal injury cases that had not been undertaken 20 or 30 years ago, and that inevitably delays the trial of a case," said Reardon of The Reardon Law Firm. "Those delays cause frustration for the litigants, both plaintiff and defense, because they both want their cases to be over with."
Reardon, an attorney for 49 years, said he's seen an overall decline in civility within the profession, and that "the system, in its entirety, has become less civil."
"The judiciary is more reluctant to enforce the rules regarding conduct of lawyers than they used to," he said. "The principal reason is they are overwhelmed. Everyone involved in the discipline of lawyers is overwhelmed by the workload."
Plus, Reardon said, what might seem to be contentious behavior is often exasperation over the slow pace of litigation.
"The judges are often unable to address discovery matters in a timely fashion, and that has caused lawyers to be frustrated and have acrimony," Reardon said. "Judges are also overwhelmed. I've felt for a long time that judges are underpaid, and the judiciary is underpaid and understaffed."
|From Trusted Guide to Service Provider
New London-based Geraghty & Bonnano attorney Mark Dubois, Connecticut's former chief disciplinary counsel, says he's seen this uncivil behavior from contentious attorneys up close. And it's getting worse, he said.
"I think stress is a part of it. I also think the political climate reflects a coarsening of social discourse in many arenas," Dubois said. "It used to be that a lawyer was a trusted guide and adviser, but now in many instances, they are just a service provider."
Dubois continued: "I've been involved in the lawyer-discipline end for 16-plus years, and lawyers today are more likely to send angry letters or file complaints, instead of just picking up the phone and talking it out."
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
State High Court Adopts Modern Standard for Who Keeps $70K Engagement Ring After Breakup
Trending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250