Waterbury Attorney Gets $96,183 Jury Verdict for Woman Injured in Car Crash
A New Britain jury awarded $96,183 to plaintiff Norma Schneider, whose suit argued she'd suffered lifelong neck injuries in a 2017 car crash in Berlin.
November 08, 2019 at 06:24 PM
3 minute read
A six-person New Britain jury has awarded $96,183 to a 70-year-old woman who sustained permanent neck injuries after her vehicle was rear-ended in Berlin in 2017.
The jury rendered its verdict in favor of Windsor resident Norma Schneider after deliberating for about two hours on Oct. 23.
The case hinged on fighting back defense claims that Schneider must have been better because she stopped physical therapy soon after the crash.
But plaintiff attorney Mark Kochanowicz was able to provide the jury with a compelling reason for Schneider stopping treatment: she lost her job.
"It really resonated with the jury that when you lose your job you can't afford co-pays," said Kochanowicz, an associate with the Waterbury offices of Trantolo & Trantolo. "She just could not afford the treatment. The defense hung their hat on that, saying that if you are hurt bad enough, you'd still seek treatment. She just could not afford it though."
Schneider was out of work and unable to seek medical treatment for about six weeks after defendant Amy Pedemonti's Grand Caravan rear-ended her, Kochanowicz said. But she resumed treatment, including physical therapy and pain management, after she obtained a job as a personal care assistant for the elderly. Her pain management doctor gave Schneider several injections into her neck.
The plaintiff's side called two witnesses: Schneider and her husband Roland. The defense called none.
In addition to the Schneiders testifying before the jury, Kochanowicz said he also submitted medical records from his client's pain management and orthopedic doctors.
"The biggest thing the records showed was that her neck injury was permanent," Kochanowicz said.
Pedemonti died before the trial, but Kochanowicz said her death was not connected to the accident.
Initially Pedemonti denied fault. In court papers, the defense argued the plaintiff was responsible for the accident because of negligence and carelessness. The pleadings stated Schneider "operated her vehicle in such a way that she came to a sudden stop, without regard for other vehicles lawfully using the roadway."
But Kochanowicz said Pedemonti's attorney, Raymond Epps of the Hartford-based Law Office of Mark Gilcreast, admitted to her liability before trial.
"It was a pretty straightforward trial," Epps said.
Kochanowicz said the defense's last offer before trial was for $16,000.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDC Judge Rules Russia Not Immune in Ukrainian Arbitration Award Dispute
2 minute readRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250