No area of the country is impervious to the increased frequency and severity of professional liability claims asserted against aging services facilities, or the rising costs associated with resolution. According to claim data from CNA over a six-year period, claims in some sectors of the aging services industry have doubled, and the severity has increased by 60%.
These double-digit increases in claim costs have compounded over multiple years, leaving previously "conservative" venues vulnerable to the negative effects of the upward trajectory. With no relief in sight, aging services providers must ready themselves for the financial realities of a new marketplace.
Some insurance companies have consolidated in response to the current climate, while others have exited the marketplace. These changes have led to a market shift, characterized by a high demand for coverage, reduced product supply, and the imposition of stricter underwriting standards.
This hard market will test resources and partnerships. Only the most resilient and responsible insurance companies will endure and confront the evolving landscape. For those companies that do persevere, a pricing action is imperative in order to remain in the market in the face of unprecedented loss-cost inflation.
Additionally, the aging services industry is very much under scrutiny right now.
The increase in claim frequency and severity is due, in part, to societal misconceptions that aging services providers do not adhere to the standard of care consumers expect. This belief has adversely affected professional liability claim adjudication, changing how some juries seek to reimburse those they view as harmed by substandard care.
|Factors impacting litigation
A number of factors have converged in the aging services industry to create an adverse litigation climate and persistent negative image, including:
- Plaintiff attorney specialization. Nationwide educational seminars that capitalize on a growing distrust of aging services providers are designed for legal practitioners to share information and strategies while honing successful litigation tactics. As a result, attorneys are bringing a high level of expertise in claim prosecution and negotiations.
- A perception that profits are more important than residents. By highlighting an organization's profit motivation, staffing deficiencies or quality challenges in litigation, plaintiff attorneys seek to influence jurors by focusing on the conduct of the organization, rather than the circumstances surrounding the resident's injury. And in some cases, the strategy results in excessive damage awards.
- Aggressive litigation tactics. Using the "Reptile Theory" in litigation, plaintiff attorneys appeal to jurors' basic survival instinct, persuading them to make decisions based upon fear rather than logic and reason. When employed effectively, the strategy motivates jurors to protect individuals from harm, often leading to high damage awards against organizations perceived to be a danger to residents and the greater community.
- Negative media coverage. Aging services organizations are often in the headlines for lawsuits and negative events. In the absence of an effective crisis management strategy, facilities lose the ability to control public perception, further eroding their credibility and reputation.
Risk management in aging services
Several principles of risk management can be used to help aging services providers mitigate potential risk exposures:
- Delineate expectations. Failure to understand and manage resident/family expectations is a common source of conflict and potential litigation. To help ensure resident placements are suitable and care expectations are mutually agreed upon, thoroughly delineate serve capabilities and limitations for prospective residents and families.
- Prioritize fall-related risks. Resident falls remain a significant challenge confronting aging services communities. The sheer volume of falls underscores the need to focus on preventing resident falls, mitigating fall-related injuries, and managing the cost of claims.
- Foster resident and family trust. A trusting relationship requires ongoing communication and a commitment to transparency in every interaction — not solely following untoward events. At the outset of care, delineate facility capabilities and realistic service goals for residents and families, and reinforce progress and expectations through ongoing discussions.
- Address staff turnover. An unstable workforce often results in recurrent staff turnover and can undermine resident/family trust. Aging services organizations should focus on hiring the appropriate mix of staff members and provide them with ample orientation and training in order to avoid a chronic cycle of relationship building and the resulting dissatisfaction.
- Train leaders. Creative and engaged leaders are transforming institutional facilities of yesteryear into progressive organizations of choice. Training and development opportunities should focus on quality improvement, resident satisfaction management, relationship-building skills, systems thinking, and fiscal and human resources management.
- Empower staff. The provision of safe, high-quality resident care requires knowledgeable, empowered, and well-integrated staff. Proper onboarding and orientation that emphasizes interactive, long-term learning can create a solid foundation for employee relations and help ensure a more loyal, dedicated, and stable workforce.
At a time of market uncertainty, it is critical for aging services organizations to align with an insurance partner that has demonstrated stability under challenging market conditions. Although lower-cost insurance companies or risk retention group models may be tempting, weak, or substandard coverage terms come at a risk. With the right insurer, aging services organizations can better address coverage needs, mitigate risk exposures, and strengthen their defense posture in the event of litigation.
Blaine Thomas is vice president and aging services industry leader at CNA.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Government Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readTrump Mulls Big Changes to Banking Regulation, Unsettling the Industry
Trending Stories
- 1Connecticut Movers: Year-End Promotions, Hires and an Office Opening
- 2Luigi Mangione Defense Attorney Says NYC Mayor’s Comments on Case Raise Fair Trial Concerns
- 3Revisiting the Boundaries Between Proper and Improper Argument: 10 Years Later
- 4Hochul Vetoes 'Grieving Families' Bill, Faulting a Lack of Changes to Suit Her Concerns
- 5Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Customers: Developments on ‘Conquesting’ from the Ninth Circuit
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250