Arbitrators Award $760,364 to Norwalk Man Injured in Car Crash
Three arbitrators have awarded plaintiff Ivan Zapata $760,364.
November 14, 2019 at 11:23 AM
3 minute read
Arbitrators have awarded $760,364 to a 53-year-old Norwalk man who suffered lower back and spine injuries after another motorist T-boned the car he was driving on Saugatuck Avenue in Westport in 2015.
Agustin Sevillano, the attorney representing plaintiff Ivan Zapata, said his biggest obstacle was making his case to the arbitrators that his client was in pain, and suffered injuries from the accident, even though he didn't have surgery right after the crash.
"I had an insurance company that was having a tough time buying the surgery given that it did not take place soon after the motor vehicle accident," said Sevillano, a partner at Bridgeport-based Cooper Sevillano. "This was overcome by a thorough review of the medical records. It showed that my client had consistent complaints throughout his treatment and the MRI findings were consistent with his complaints."
A lawsuit was filed in March 2017 in Bridgeport Superior Court, but both sides worked with three arbitrators to come to an agreement before the case went to trial.
The plaintiff's side, Sevillano said, originally sought $1.3 million, while the defense's original offer was $250,000. The arbitrators agreed to a figure in the middle, at $760,364. The money will be disbursed within the week, Sevillano said.
Representing defendant driver Steven Phillips was Ida Pullo, an attorney with the Law Offices of Mark S. Gilcreast in Hamden. Pullo did not respond to a request for comment Thursday.
Sevillano said he believes the arbitrators awarded the money because "the evidence was clear that not only was my client injured, but he underwent surgery due to such injuries, and symptoms remain to the present day due to those injuries."
Sevillano said Zapata, who was wearing a seat belt at the time of the crash, had surgery to his lower back. According to the lawsuit, Zapata also had injuries to his spine, post-traumatic headaches, post-surgical scarring and suffered from depression related to the accident.
Today, more than four years after the accident, Sevillano said Zapata "continues to experience daily low back pain, which occasionally causes leg pain and discomfort. Every single activity which involves my client's low back is now limited and that includes sitting for too long, standing for too long, lifting objects, sleeping, and many household activities have been affected."
Zapata, who incurred about $250,000 in medical expenses, was given a 23% permanent partial impairment as a result of his low back injuries, Sevillano said.
The defense, in court papers, argued Zapata was to blame for the car accident due to his own negligence and carelessness. The pleadings claim Zapata "was inattentive to his surroundings," and failed to keep a proper and reasonable lookout for other motor vehicles.
Related stories:
Waterbury Attorney Gets $96,183 Jury Verdict for Woman Injured in Car Crash
Litchfield County Attorneys Secure $250,000 for Client Injured in Car Crash
Cheshire Attorney Secures $365,000 Settlement for Woman Injured in Car Crash
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Administration Faces Legal Challenge Over EO Impacting Federal Workers
3 minute readSettlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250