Freedom of Information Must Continue To Be Safeguarded
A Freedom of Information Commission Public Information Officer explains transparency laws to private citizens and public officials alike.
November 15, 2019 at 03:38 PM
3 minute read
Connecticut's Freedom of Information Act was created to let people see and understand the workings of their government. But putting the Act into practical use sometimes takes some help.
That's where the FOIC's Public Information Officer comes in. Much more than a mouthpiece, this person is involved daily in explaining to the public, and state and town officials, how to comply with FOI issues and requests. The guidance minimizes confusion and promotes the proper and timely disclosure of public information and records.
To give one example, municipal officials are often surprised to learn that an improper "meeting" of town officials—the kind that really needs to be formally announced and open to the public—could unwittingly take place at a diner, by email, or in a church parking lot.
It's news to many municipal officials, but it doesn't take a town hall venue to create a meeting. There are many other not-so-obvious features of open government. The FOIC public information officer, in a friendly manner, explains these details to private citizens and public officials every day of the work week.
The job of this "trail guide" to the FOI laws has been threatened repeatedly in recent years. An attack came earlier this year in a Republican budget proposal in the state Legislature.
If the proposal had passed into law, the role of public information officer would have either been completely eliminated or merged into a new position in the governor's office.
This would inevitably lead to less experienced personnel guiding the public and agency employees. And what's more insidious, the job would be directly under the authority of the governor's office, instead of the independent Freedom of Information Commission.
The FOIC, with its own legal staff and the ability to appeal meritorious cases, presents a valuable check and balance against excessive government secrecy and obfuscation of what our public servants are doing with the taxpayers' money and trust.
Government transparency and openness are best served if the public and agency staff can get authoritative, independent advice from the FOIC itself.
The governor falls under FOI, and is subject to FOI requests. Therefore, if the officer was working inside the governor's office, how independent could the information officer's advice appear to be regarding information requested from the governor's office? This is the basic rationale for having the FOI commission separate and apart from the governor's administration.
In addition, the information officer is a part-time dispute mediator. In any given year the officer negotiates scores of practical solutions. These balance the agencies' legitimate rights to information confidentiality with the public's right to know. This saves time and effort that would otherwise be spent in mediation or litigation.
The information officer's function is necessary for the effective functioning of Connecticut's leading "open government" agency. In the public's interest—and for government's internal health—this job simply should not be on the chopping block.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllADVANCE Act Offers Conn. Opportunity to Enhance Carbon-Free Energy and Improve Reliability With Advanced Nuclear Technologies
Trending Stories
- 1$34M Verdict Shows How 1 Claim Could Ratchet Up Employment Suit
- 2OIG Progress Puts Connecticut in Leadership Position
- 3Bankruptcy Judge to Step Down in 2025
- 4Justices Seek Solicitor General's Views on Music Industry's Copyright Case Against ISP
- 5Judge to hear arguments on whether Google's advertising tech constitutes a monopoly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250