Justice Andrew McDonald Discusses Foiled Bid for Chief Judgeship
Connecticut Supreme Court Associate Justice Andrew McDonald looks back at the spring of 2018, when he was in the running to become chief justice.
November 15, 2019 at 11:45 AM
4 minute read
It was about 20 months ago that Connecticut Associate Supreme Court Justice Andrew McDonald was thrust into the national spotlight as the controversial selection of then-Gov. Dannel Malloy to become chief justice of the court.
McDonald, now 53, was narrowly approved for the post in the Democrat-controlled House of Representatives, but voted down 19-16 in the Senate, almost exclusively along party lines.
Now, in a wide-ranging interview with the Connecticut Law Tribune, McDonald said he believes some of those who voted against him did so because he is gay. But he said most likely did so because of his longtime friendship with Malloy, a Democrat, for whom he worked when the former governor was mayor of Stamford.
The partisan battle for the high court's top job was pivotal for the judge, who as a boy idolized his two public-defender uncles, and now as a man at the top of his profession, has a strong desire to continue on the bench for another 17 years, when he reaches the mandatory retirement age of 70.
"It would be an honor of a lifetime," said McDonald, who was born, raised and still lives in Stamford.
Looking back at the fight to become chief justice of the state's high court, a job that ultimately went to Justice Richard Robinson, McDonald said he was saddened by the outcome, but never, ever angry.
"I was disappointed to see a process that I had previously been so intimately involved in as a state senator for eight years turn into something I barely recognized," McDonald, a Democrat, said of the state Legislature. "We had a centuries-old tradition of not voting for or against nominees because of political consideration. I will say it was an unfortunate turn of events, and I hope it was an anomaly in Connecticut history."
McDonald said he also learned about himself during that tumultuous time.
"I learned that I have a reservoir of perseverance and resilience that I did not know I could tap into," McDonald said.
Those who know McDonald well say the man behind the robe is bright, easy-going, dedicated and has a quick wit.
"I met Andrew when he was the 27-year-old campaign manager for Dan Malloy when he was running for mayor of Stamford for the first time," said longtime friend Tom Cassone, now a partner at Meister Seelig & Fein in its Stamford office. "I was surprised that a guy 10 years younger than me was heading a campaign for someone who had a significant chance of winning an election in a city like Stamford."
Cassone continued: "It was a lot of responsibility and Andrew handled it well. He does not take himself too seriously and he has a biting sense of humor and a quick wit."
From the earliest memories, McDonald wanted only to be an attorney. He remembers being 7 years old and idolizing the work that his uncles did in New York City.
"Whenever they'd come to visit, I'd hear stories of the cases they were working on," McDonald recalled. "I was captivated by the whole process and the truth-seeking function of criminal trials."
While McDonald worked for 20 years at Pullman & Comley, he never practiced in criminal law like his uncles. But he said he loved his time at the firm, where he still has many friends. And now, McDonald said he is proud to be on the state Supreme Court, where he was nominated to in 2012.
"Being on the Supreme Court, we have the opportunity and responsibility to really develop our decisions with an eye not only toward getting the law right, but also of serving the interests of the state," he said. "Everyday I am professionally challenged by both the questions in the cases we are working on and by the power of the legal minds with whom I work on the court."
The most important part of being a judge, McDonald said, "is listening critically and probing the outer limits of what the arguments of counsel would mean for the development of the law."
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Conversation with NLJ Lifetime Achievement Award Winner Jeh Johnson
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250