New London Attorney Clinches $1 Million Settlement Over Fatal Crash
The estate of a 25-year-old woman killed instantly in a truck-vs.-car crash in Waterbury in June 2017 has settled the case for $1 million.
November 19, 2019 at 06:04 PM
4 minute read
The attorney for the estate of a 25-year-old woman, killed instantly when a pickup truck hit the passenger side of a 2005 Mazda head-on, has settled the case for $1 million.
The impact of the crash, which occurred on Route 73 in Waterbury in June 2017, killed passenger Samantha Mallette and her grandmother Katherine Wadman, who was driving the car.
The biggest challenge plaintiff attorney Joseph Barnes said he faced in representing Mallette's estate was that Wadman might have played some role in the collision.
"Katherine Wadman was alleged to have made a left-hand turn against the red light," said Barnes, a member of The Reardon Law Firm in New London. "Our argument, if we went to trial, would have been to acknowledge that the grandmother may have played some role in causing the collision. But our position is that the overwhelming evidence was that the driver of the pickup truck owned the greater responsibility for the collision. By no means should the grandmother be held accountable for the entirety of the accident."
Barnes said he believes his strongest argument in settling with the defense for the $1 million policy was that Zachary Lessard, the driver of the pickup truck, was traveling 64 miles per hour in a 40 mile-per-hour zone. Lessard's speed, Barnes said, was backed up through police accident reconstruction. Lessard was driving a vehicle belonging to his employer, LT Landscaping Inc.
The Main Street America Group, the insurance carrier for Lessard's vehicle, had a $1 million policy limit, Barnes said. The money will be disbursed to the estate before the end of the year, Barnes said. The estate's executor is Kimberly Wadman, Mallette's mother.
A lawsuit was filed in June 2019, and the probate court signed off on the settlement Monday.
Barnes said Mallette's family decided against going after Lessard's assets.
Barnes said $1 million "was not sufficient to compensate this family for the loss of their daughter and sister. However, the family was not interested in pursuing Mr. Lessard and his personal assets, which they could have done. The purpose for filing the lawsuit was not one of vengeance, and my clients felt that going after Mr. Lessard personally was not something Samantha would have wanted."
There was an arrest warrant charging Lessard with negligent homicide with a motor vehicle, but Barnes said prosecutors declined to pursue the case. Maureen Platt, state's attorney for Waterbury, could not be reached for comment.
Barnes said Mallette was the associate director of admissions at her alma mater, The Westover School in Middlebury.
Lessard's attorney, Peter Barrett of Windsor-based Markey Barrett, did not respond to a request for comment Tuesday.
In court papers, the defense left it up to the plaintiff to prove its case, and denied the allegations. It also denied that Lessard's actions were the result of negligence and carelessness.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
State High Court Adopts Modern Standard for Who Keeps $70K Engagement Ring After Breakup
Trending Stories
- 1A Look Back at the Biggest Legal Industry Shifts in 2024
- 2Ben Brafman's Professional Legacy After 50 Years? Himself
- 3Ruling Provides Lessons for Investors: Mind Your Business (Affairs)!
- 4With SDNY Stay Lifted, Sex Trafficking Civil Suit Against Vince McMahon, WWE Gets Green Light
- 5Insurer Has No Duty to Defend 'Laidlow' Claims, NJ Supreme Court Says
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250