Glastonbury Attorney Secures $250,000 for Man Injured in Crash
A Massachusetts man who was seriously injured when his car was rear-ended in West Hartford in 2016 has settled his case for $250,000.
November 20, 2019 at 06:13 PM
3 minute read
The attorney for a 43-year-old Massachusetts man—who suffered head, knee and hip injuries after another motorist rear-ended the car he was driving in West Hartford in 2016—has secured $250,000 for his client.
Attorney Andrew Garza first got $20,000 for his client James Meade from defendant Michael Bailey's automobile insurance, and then $230,000 from the plaintiff's underinsured motorist policy.
Garza, co-founder of Glastonbury-based Connecticut Trial Firm, said his biggest obstacle was overcoming the defense's claim that some of Meade's injuries were preexisting. Garza served the insurer with a complaint in the case, but the case was resolved before a lawsuit was filed in court.
"The case was complicated medically because my client was hit at a high rate of speed," Garza said. "My client had his foot on the break and he jammed his right leg. He also had overlapping injuries to his right knee and right hip, some of which became worse over time. The defense tried to argue that his injuries were because of preexisting degeneration, and not caused by the collision."
Garza said he fought back against these claims from the insurance adjuster.
"My client's injuries were significant and from this incident," he said.
Garza said Meade, who is a pharmaceutical representative and missed several months of work due to the accident, suffered post-concussion syndrome to the head, as well as injuries to his right knee and right hip. Meade, Garza said, had one surgery on his right knee and one surgery to his right hip, which has a cartilage tear. No future surgeries are planned, he said. In total, Meade incurred about $60,000 in medical expenses, Garza said.
According to the police report, Bailey admitted to being distracted due to a family member's health condition, and not being able to brake in time for the stopped traffic ahead of him.
Representing Bailey was Garrett O'Keefe, an attorney with Glastonbury-based Law Offices of Christopher Connelly. O'Keefe did not respond to a request for comment Wednesday.
While the defense's initial offer to settle was for $30,000, Garza said he continued to hold out for the $230,000 policy limit, which both sides finally signed off on for Meade.
Today, Garza said, Meade "still has some ongoing pain in his right leg, but he is an avid golfer and is attempting to return to his golf game."
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllManaging Partner Vindicated in Disciplinary Proceeding Brought by Former Associate
5 minute readConnecticut Movers: Year-End Promotions, Hires and an Office Opening
5 minute readGC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250