Cellphone Records Help Stamford Lawyers Secure $18.6M Award for Crash Survivor
Pennsylvania resident Jorge Amparo suffered back and neck injuries after a tractor-trailer rear-ended the car he was driving on Interstate 95 in Westport in 2014. He won a $15 million jury verdict in May and recently both sides agreed, after filing postverdict motions, to settle the case for $18.6 million.
November 22, 2019 at 02:14 PM
4 minute read
Connecticut plaintiff and defense attorneys have agreed on a total award of $18,653,570 for a Pennsylvania man who suffered back and neck injuries after a tractor-trailer rear-ended his car in Westport in 2014.
A Stamford Superior Court jury in May awarded Jorge Amparo $14.2 million and his wife, Diva, about $800,000 for loss and future loss of consortium for a total award of $15 million. Both sides then filed postverdict motions. The defense was looking to set aside the verdict and reduce the amount, while the plaintiff's side was seeking interest on the jury award.
But plaintiff counsel Brenden Leydon, a partner with Stamford-based Wocl Leydon, told the Connecticut Law Tribune Friday he believed the defense agreed on the $18.65 million in damages because of possible misconduct on the part of Evans Delivery Co., the trucking company that employed defendant driver Jose Ayala. The defense settled before a ruling on their postverdict motions were made.
"I believed they settled because there were no significant issues we had to worry about on appeal," Leydon said. "We also had a motion pending for sanctions for discovery for misconduct during the case that had adverse risk for the defense."
Leydon continued: "There were documents related to the trucking company's cellphone policy that were not described accurately. The company's own policy barred the use of a cellphone, even hands-free, by its driver. They gave misleading information during the discovery process."
Phone records, Leydon said, showed Ayala was using his phone via Bluetooth at the time of the accident.
The $18.65 million that was disbursed earlier this month to Amparo includes the $15 million jury verdict plus $3.65 million in interest and taxable costs.
"The bulk of the $3.65 million is interest," Leydon said. "About $18,000 is taxable costs, which include filing fees and doctor's testifying."
Eight percent interest per year beginning in August 2016 when the complaint was filed was tacked on to the jury award, which brought the total award to $18.65 million.
Representing Ayala is defense counsel Gary Kaisen of Branford-based Milano & Wanat. Kaisen did not respond to a request for comment Friday.
Amparo, who had to be extricated from his vehicle following the crash in which his car was pushed into a third vehicle, had back surgery but it was not successful, his attorney said.
"The back surgery did not really work," Leydon said. "He can walk with a walker, a few steps and maybe a block on a good day. But his movement is very limited."
In addition, Leydon said, Amparo "has postconcussion syndrome to his head, chronic headaches and his ability to read for any sustained period of time was compromised."
Ayala received an infraction for driving unreasonably fast for that day's road conditions.
At the time of the crash, Amparo, now 51, was working at a Bridgeport-based water treatment plant. He has not been able to work since the accident, Leydon said.
Amparo "is happy with the settlement but, if he could have gone back in time and not have had this happened, his would have taken it," Leydon said.
In court documents, the defendants denied Ayala was driving too fast for the conditions and that he lost control of the vehicle. They also denied Ayala was negligent in any way.
Assisting Leydon was his colleague, Nicholas Wocl.
Read more:
Stamford Jury Awards $14.2 Million for Injuries in Tractor-Trailer Wreck
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
Trending Stories
- 1South Florida Attorney Charged With Aggravated Battery After Incident in Prime Rib Line
- 2'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 3Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 4‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 5State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250