Cellphone Records Help Stamford Lawyers Secure $18.6M Award for Crash Survivor
Pennsylvania resident Jorge Amparo suffered back and neck injuries after a tractor-trailer rear-ended the car he was driving on Interstate 95 in Westport in 2014. He won a $15 million jury verdict in May and recently both sides agreed, after filing postverdict motions, to settle the case for $18.6 million.
November 22, 2019 at 02:14 PM
4 minute read
Connecticut plaintiff and defense attorneys have agreed on a total award of $18,653,570 for a Pennsylvania man who suffered back and neck injuries after a tractor-trailer rear-ended his car in Westport in 2014.
A Stamford Superior Court jury in May awarded Jorge Amparo $14.2 million and his wife, Diva, about $800,000 for loss and future loss of consortium for a total award of $15 million. Both sides then filed postverdict motions. The defense was looking to set aside the verdict and reduce the amount, while the plaintiff's side was seeking interest on the jury award.
But plaintiff counsel Brenden Leydon, a partner with Stamford-based Wocl Leydon, told the Connecticut Law Tribune Friday he believed the defense agreed on the $18.65 million in damages because of possible misconduct on the part of Evans Delivery Co., the trucking company that employed defendant driver Jose Ayala. The defense settled before a ruling on their postverdict motions were made.
"I believed they settled because there were no significant issues we had to worry about on appeal," Leydon said. "We also had a motion pending for sanctions for discovery for misconduct during the case that had adverse risk for the defense."
Leydon continued: "There were documents related to the trucking company's cellphone policy that were not described accurately. The company's own policy barred the use of a cellphone, even hands-free, by its driver. They gave misleading information during the discovery process."
Phone records, Leydon said, showed Ayala was using his phone via Bluetooth at the time of the accident.
The $18.65 million that was disbursed earlier this month to Amparo includes the $15 million jury verdict plus $3.65 million in interest and taxable costs.
"The bulk of the $3.65 million is interest," Leydon said. "About $18,000 is taxable costs, which include filing fees and doctor's testifying."
Eight percent interest per year beginning in August 2016 when the complaint was filed was tacked on to the jury award, which brought the total award to $18.65 million.
Representing Ayala is defense counsel Gary Kaisen of Branford-based Milano & Wanat. Kaisen did not respond to a request for comment Friday.
Amparo, who had to be extricated from his vehicle following the crash in which his car was pushed into a third vehicle, had back surgery but it was not successful, his attorney said.
"The back surgery did not really work," Leydon said. "He can walk with a walker, a few steps and maybe a block on a good day. But his movement is very limited."
In addition, Leydon said, Amparo "has postconcussion syndrome to his head, chronic headaches and his ability to read for any sustained period of time was compromised."
Ayala received an infraction for driving unreasonably fast for that day's road conditions.
At the time of the crash, Amparo, now 51, was working at a Bridgeport-based water treatment plant. He has not been able to work since the accident, Leydon said.
Amparo "is happy with the settlement but, if he could have gone back in time and not have had this happened, his would have taken it," Leydon said.
In court documents, the defendants denied Ayala was driving too fast for the conditions and that he lost control of the vehicle. They also denied Ayala was negligent in any way.
Assisting Leydon was his colleague, Nicholas Wocl.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
State High Court Adopts Modern Standard for Who Keeps $70K Engagement Ring After Breakup
Trending Stories
- 1How Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
- 2Insurers Dodge Sherwin-Williams' Claim for $102M Lead Paint Abatement Payment, State High Court Rules
- 3Supply Chain Challenges and Opportunities Under the Second Trump Administration
- 4As Atlanta Partners Moved to Am Law 200 Firms at a Higher Rate in 2024, 2 New Arrivals Benefited
- 5A Tech-Enabled Approach to Professional Development Is the Path Forward for Young Lawyers
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250