Father-and-Son Lawyers Get $23M Verdict for Boy Injured in School Bus Crash
Two Watertown-based attorneys have secured a $23 million jury verdict on behalf of a then-12-year-old-boy who suffered two skull fractures when the school bus he was a passenger in struck a tree.
December 02, 2019 at 01:29 PM
4 minute read
A Waterbury Superior Court jury has awarded $23,050,000 to a boy who suffered two skull fractures after the school bus he was a passenger in struck a tree in Wolcott in 2015.
The case hinged on whether the boy's aggressive behavior following the accident was due to his moderate to severe autism or the bus collision. The plaintiff's attorneys—father-and-son team Michael and Jeremy D'Amico—expressed outrage at what they claim was the defense's attempt to paint plaintiff Gabriel Goncalves as an autistic boy with little or no future before the crash.
"It almost seemed like I was moving back in time, and that we turned the clock back 50 or 75 years to where there were biases and prejudices in society about what children with autism looked like, and whether they should be put away some place," said Michael D'Amico, a member at D'Amico & Pettinicchi in Watertown. "It was wrong, so very wrong. It was sad that the defense looked at Gabriel that way before the crash."
The jury's Nov. 25 verdict, Michael D'Amico said, was a vindication.
"Gabriel wasn't viewed by the jury as a child with no future before the crash," he said. "The defense painted him as a child with autism with no future before the crash, but children with autism can be employed and can live independently and semi-independently."
Representing bus driver Mark Hudobenko and Worhunsky Corp., the bus company, was Darien solo practitioner G. Randall Avery, who declined Monday to comment on the case.
Representing defendant Utica Mutual Insurance Co. in the underinsured portion of the claim was attorney Michele Wojcik of Cheshire-based Nuzzo & Roberts. Wojcik did not respond to a request for comment Monday.
In court papers, the defense maintained the bus driver was neither negligent nor careless.
But the jury found the bus driver 74% responsible for the crash, and attributed the other 26% to the driver of a car involved in the incident.
D'Amico said he was also able to counter the defense's claim that Goncalves' behavioral decline was related to his preexisting autism and puberty. Following the crash, the boy would sometimes show aggressive and impulsive behavior, according to his Nov. 21 amended complaint.
D'Amico said he believes he was able to show through numerous medical experts that Goncalves' behavior was due to the effects of the accident. Those experts, D'Amico said, included a neuropsychologist, a pediatric neurologist and a pediatric and behavioral psychologist. All testified at trial that the crash was the key factor in the boy's behavioral changes.
In addition, D'Amico said, several fact witnesses testified to the changes after the crash, including Gabriel's parents, brother and behavioral aides who had worked with the boy before and after the crash.
According to D'Amico and the complaint, the bus driver claimed a green car was swerving in and out of lanes causing him to crash the school bus. The bus crashed into a tree on the right passenger side, just where Goncalves was sitting. There were five people on the bus, but the boy was the most severely injured, D'Amico said. The green car was never located, and while witnesses to the crash claimed they never saw a green car, one of the other students on the bus said he'd seen it.
According to an air-bag control module, Hudobenko, the bus driver, was traveling between 43 and 45 miles per hour at the time of the crash. The speed limit was 35 miles per hour. The police did not cite Hudobenko, D'Amico said.
The jury verdict could be appealed, but D'Amico said he saw no "appealable issues of any consequence on the defense side."
Related stories:
Milford Lawyers Negotiate $4.6 Million Settlement for Injured Motorcyclist
New Haven Jury Awards $3.2M to Woman Who Suffered Brain Injury in Fall on Ice
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Administration Faces Legal Challenge Over EO Impacting Federal Workers
3 minute readSettlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250