Who Is Jeffrey Mueller? Gunmaker Adds Litigator for Sandy Hook Court Fight
As the battle between the Sandy Hook families and Remington enters its sixth year of litigation, Remington this week brought on a big name firm to join in its representation: Day Pitney.
December 05, 2019 at 04:27 PM
4 minute read
Two months after the Sandy Hook families hired former U.S. Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr., of Munger, Tolles & Olson, as counsel in its litigation at the U.S. Supreme Court with Remington Arms Company LLC, the gunmaker has hired its own powerhouse firm: Day Pitney.
Court records show Day Pitney's Jeffrey Paul Mueller, from the firm's Hartford offices, entered an appearance Wednesday on behalf of Remington.
Mueller represents the company in the lawsuit brought by families of nine victims of the 2012 mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School. The suit seeks financial damages against Remington and its daughter company, Bushmaster Firearms International LLC.
In a case that is entering its sixth year of litigation, large firms have joined the effort on both sides. In addition to Munger, which has more than 200 attorneys, and Day Pitney, which has more than 300 attorneys in 13 offices, Baker Botts is also part of the litigation. The international law firm has about 725 attorneys, and is one of the firms representing Remington.
Day Pitney and Mueller's appearance in the case comes nearly one month after the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear a Remington appeal. Verrilli and Munger only worked on the case for the families as it related to the U.S. Supreme Court.
The company had raised a challenge, arguing it had zero liability for the Sandy Hook Elementary School mass shooting, which left 20 schoolchildren and six educators dead. The case will decide whether victims' families can hold companies accountable for crimes committed with their products. It will now continue in Connecticut courts.
|Meet Mueller
Mueller did not respond to a request for comment Thursday. A 2007 graduate of Yale Law School, where he was senior editor of Yale Law & Policy Review, he has been with Day Pitney since September 2008. He was named partner in 2016. He clerked for U.S. District Judge Alvin Thompson.
The Connecticut Law Tribune named him among the "New Leaders of the Law for 2014." Mueller's biography on Day Pitney's website shows he represents clients in complex business disputes involving negligence, breach of contract, fraud and misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty, unfair trade practices, and securities violations, among other issues. His clients include United Technologies Corp.
"Jeff is incredibly smart and very creative," United Technologies chief litigation counsel Steven Greenspan said of Mueller in a testimonial posted on Day Pitney's website. "He sees arguments and positions that other lawyers simply don't see."
In 2017, Mueller represented Duracell in a federal lawsuit against Ocean State Job Lot, claiming the discount retail chain was selling Duracell products not meant for sale in the United States. That case is pending.
Remington was pinning its hopes on the federal Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, which shields gunmakers, and it hoped the country's highest court would overrule a March Connecticut Supreme Court ruling. In that ruling, the state court justices found that the plaintiffs could sue Remington under an exception to the federal law, allowing legal action to proceed over the way the company sold and marketed firearms,
Attorneys for the families have reiterated throughout that the AR-15 rifle, like the one Adam Lanza used at Sandy Hook, should only be used in battle, and not sold to civilians.
Josh Koskoff, Alinor Sterling, and Katherine Mesner-Hage of Bridgeport-based Koskoff Koskoff & Bieder originally filed the lawsuit. Andrew Friedman, a spokesman for the firm, said no one from the plaintiff's side would be commenting on Remington's hiring of Mueller and Day Pitney.
In addition to Day Pitney, Remington's legal team includes Baker Botts litigators Scott Keller and Stephanie Cagnairt, and Swanson Martin & Bell attorneys James Vogts and Andrew Lothson of Chicago.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDC Judge Rules Russia Not Immune in Ukrainian Arbitration Award Dispute
2 minute readRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Pa. Hospital Agrees to $16M Settlement Following High Schooler's Improper Discharge
- 2Connecticut Movers: Year-End Promotions, Hires and an Office Opening
- 3Luigi Mangione Defense Attorney Says NYC Mayor’s Comments on Case Raise Fair Trial Concerns
- 4Revisiting the Boundaries Between Proper and Improper Argument: 10 Years Later
- 5Hochul Vetoes 'Grieving Families' Bill, Faulting a Lack of Changes to Suit Her Concerns
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250