Court: Parole Board's Pardon Is Same as Governor's in Wayzaro Walton Immigration Suit
After nearly eight years of litigation, Wayzaro Walton learned Monday that the federal government would not be deporting her to England over crimes she committed in Connecticut.
December 09, 2019 at 06:32 PM
4 minute read
Following a nearly eight-year-long court battle to prevent the deportation of Hartford resident Wayzaro Walton to England for felony shoplifting and five misdemeanor convictions, the Board of Immigration Appeals has ruled that Walton can permanently remain in Connecticut.
The deportation fight raised questions about the federal government's acknowledgment of state pardons, and is good news for defendants facing deportation for crimes committed in the United States.
The Board of Immigration Appeals, which is part of the Department of Justice, made its ruling Dec. 5, but Walton's attorney Erin O'Neil-Baker received news of the decision via mail Monday morning.
Walton's case hinged on the nature of her pardon.
The 35-year-old, who moved from England to the United States when she was 4 years old, had received a pardon from a governor-appointed board. But the federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency had been saying for years it only recognizes pardons that came directly from governors.
Judge Edward Grant wrote the ruling for the Board of Immigration Appeals.
"We are persuaded that the respondent's pardon by the Connecticut Board of Pardons and Paroles has the effect of an executive pardon," Grant wrote. "As a result, there is no reason to address the further arguments in respondent's motion."
No one from the Department of Justice responded to a request for comment by press time Monday.
|'Her Life Changed'
Connecticut Gov. Ned Lamont applauded the outcome.
"Today's ruling is a win for every resident of Connecticut," he said in a written statement. "A pardon granted in the state of Connecticut is no different from a pardon issued in any other state. … Any attempt by a federal agency to ignore that would have created an unjust reality for every person who lives in Connecticut."
Walton's lawyer, O'Neil-Baker, is a partner with the Hartford Legal Group. She has been litigating pro bono on Walton's behalf since 2012.
"It was very difficult to go up against the Department of Homeland Security and their very strong position against the validity of Connecticut pardons," O'Neil-Baker said. "Through legal challenges and the extraordinary support from the Connecticut Attorney General's Office, the Connecticut governor's office and others, and the perseverance of Wayzaro, we were able to keep going."
"I think that the DHS position was very entrenched," O-Neil-Baker continued. "This change of the law today will affect a lot of people. I don't know if they underestimated me, but they might have underestimated the strength and authority of the state of Connecticut."
Walton lives with her wife and teenager daughter in Hartford.
O'Neil-Baker said she spoke to her client late Monday morning.
"She was breathless," the attorney said. "It's really hard for her to accept this decision, because it's such a huge change for her."
Noting that her client was released late last month from a detention center after spending eight months there, O'Neil-Baker said, "She barely adjusted to being released, and now she is told she's getting her permanent residency back. It's a huge life change for her. Her life changed forever today."
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readTo Woo Law Firms, Legal Training Platforms Are Combining Hands-On and Online Learning
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250