Court: Parole Board's Pardon Is Same as Governor's in Wayzaro Walton Immigration Suit
After nearly eight years of litigation, Wayzaro Walton learned Monday that the federal government would not be deporting her to England over crimes she committed in Connecticut.
December 09, 2019 at 06:32 PM
4 minute read
Following a nearly eight-year-long court battle to prevent the deportation of Hartford resident Wayzaro Walton to England for felony shoplifting and five misdemeanor convictions, the Board of Immigration Appeals has ruled that Walton can permanently remain in Connecticut.
The deportation fight raised questions about the federal government's acknowledgment of state pardons, and is good news for defendants facing deportation for crimes committed in the United States.
The Board of Immigration Appeals, which is part of the Department of Justice, made its ruling Dec. 5, but Walton's attorney Erin O'Neil-Baker received news of the decision via mail Monday morning.
Walton's case hinged on the nature of her pardon.
The 35-year-old, who moved from England to the United States when she was 4 years old, had received a pardon from a governor-appointed board. But the federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency had been saying for years it only recognizes pardons that came directly from governors.
Judge Edward Grant wrote the ruling for the Board of Immigration Appeals.
"We are persuaded that the respondent's pardon by the Connecticut Board of Pardons and Paroles has the effect of an executive pardon," Grant wrote. "As a result, there is no reason to address the further arguments in respondent's motion."
No one from the Department of Justice responded to a request for comment by press time Monday.
'Her Life Changed'
Connecticut Gov. Ned Lamont applauded the outcome.
"Today's ruling is a win for every resident of Connecticut," he said in a written statement. "A pardon granted in the state of Connecticut is no different from a pardon issued in any other state. … Any attempt by a federal agency to ignore that would have created an unjust reality for every person who lives in Connecticut."
Walton's lawyer, O'Neil-Baker, is a partner with the Hartford Legal Group. She has been litigating pro bono on Walton's behalf since 2012.
"It was very difficult to go up against the Department of Homeland Security and their very strong position against the validity of Connecticut pardons," O'Neil-Baker said. "Through legal challenges and the extraordinary support from the Connecticut Attorney General's Office, the Connecticut governor's office and others, and the perseverance of Wayzaro, we were able to keep going."
"I think that the DHS position was very entrenched," O-Neil-Baker continued. "This change of the law today will affect a lot of people. I don't know if they underestimated me, but they might have underestimated the strength and authority of the state of Connecticut."
Walton lives with her wife and teenager daughter in Hartford.
O'Neil-Baker said she spoke to her client late Monday morning.
"She was breathless," the attorney said. "It's really hard for her to accept this decision, because it's such a huge change for her."
Noting that her client was released late last month from a detention center after spending eight months there, O'Neil-Baker said, "She barely adjusted to being released, and now she is told she's getting her permanent residency back. It's a huge life change for her. Her life changed forever today."
Related stories:
'She's Still Here': Meet Connecticut Attorney Behind 8-Year Pro Bono Fight
'Human Decency Should Prevail Here': Wayzaro Walton Issued Stay 2 Days Before Deportation to England
Tong Sues US Government for 'Singling Out' Connecticut Pardons
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDC Lawsuits Seek to Prevent Mass Firings and Public Naming of FBI Agents
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1January Petitions Press High Court on Guns, Birth Certificate Sex Classifications
- 2'A Waste of Your Time': Practice Tips From Judges in the Oakland Federal Courthouse
- 3Judge Extends Tom Girardi's Time in Prison Medical Facility to Feb. 20
- 4Supreme Court Denies Trump's Request to Pause Pending Environmental Cases
- 5‘Blitzkrieg of Lawlessness’: Environmental Lawyers Decry EPA Spending Freeze
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250