Delta Injured Passengers Case Moved to Federal Court in Conn.
Attorneys for Delta Air Lines have successfully moved a lawsuit facing the airline from state Superior Court to Connecticut federal court. A mother and her young daughter were apparently injured when a large light fixture cover fell on their heads while seated in the plane.
December 17, 2019 at 04:20 PM
3 minute read
Citing the $75,000 threshold of damages sought, U.S. District Judge Stefan Underhill of the District of Connecticut has granted Delta Airlines' request to transfer a lawsuit filed on behalf of a mother and her minor daughter injured on a Delta flight from Connecticut Superior Court to U.S. District Court District of Connecticut.
Attorneys for Delta Airlines requested the move to federal court in the case of Evans and Vargas v. Delta Air Lines after learning in a Dec. 10 phone call with plaintiff's counsel that they were seeking to recover $150,000 for Theresa Evans and $25,000 for her daughter, Alyna Vargas. The matter was moved to federal court Tuesday.
The lawsuit, which was first filed in Bridgeport Superior Court on Aug. 6, alleges Evans and Vargas were on a Delta flight in September 2017 when "suddenly and without warning, both plaintiffs were struck in the head when a large light fixture cover fell down from above their seat."
The lawsuit says Evans and Vargas, who live in Bridgeport, sustained serious injuries due to the neglect of the Atlanta-based airline. The lawsuit does not identify the age of Evans or her daughter.
Evans, the lawsuit says, sustained a concussion and a head injury in addition to injuries to her neck, back and face. The suit says Evans also has had migraines, intractable headaches and dizziness and suffers from mental and physical pain and suffering.
Her daughter, the lawsuit says, suffered a concussion, head injury, contusion to her head and cheek, and swelling under her left eye. In addition, the claim contends, Vargas also had a severe shock to the nervous system and suffers from mental and physical pain and suffering.
Both mother and daughter, the lawsuit states, will be forced to expend money for X-rays, MRIs and other medical needs.
The suit also says the airline was negligent in that it didn't properly maintain and inspect the light fixture cover, failed to warn the plaintiffs of the unsecured light fixture cover, and failed to properly secure the light fixture cover in question.
As of Tuesday, Delta had not issued a response to the plaintiff's claims.
Representing Delta are Shrina Faldu and Robert Laurie, both with West Hartford-based Gfeller Laurie. Laurie declined to comment, and Faldu did not respond to a request for comment Tuesday.
Representing Evans and Vargas is Bradley Sorrentino of the Branford-based Law Offices of Bradley L. Sorrentino. Sorrentino was unavailable to comment by press time.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllChallenge to TikTok Ban-or-Sale Law Faces First Amendment Scrutiny at DC Circuit
In Social Media-Related Suits, Courts Must Apply Discovery Rule on Case-by-Case Basis, Mass. Justices Say
4 minute readBiden's Top Supreme Court Lawyer Talks Argument Prep, Emergency Docket Ahead of New Term
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250