Former Conn. Chili's Waitress Claims Sexual Harassment and Unpaid Wages
The eatery chain, Chili's, has been hit with yet another lawsuit—this time in Connecticut where a former waitress/server says she was underpaid and sexually harassed by a fellow employee.
December 18, 2019 at 12:19 PM
4 minute read
A 41-year-old Colchester woman has sued the Glastonbury Chili's Grill & Bar restaurant claiming both sexual harassment and owed wages.
Plaintiff Jill McAvoy's lawsuit, which was filed Dec. 10 in New London Superior Court, comes on the heels of numerous settlements and lawsuits throughout the country against the eatery chain.
Those cases include a sexual harassment and retaliation claim against the eatery in Colorado in April 2019; a tip-sharing lawsuit against Chili's was settled for $250,000 in Pennsylvania in 2017; and two former Chili's employees in central New York sued in February 2019 claiming they were underpaid.
No one from Dallas-based Brinker International Inc., the owner of the Chili's chain, responded to a request for comment Wednesday.
In the Connecticut case, McAvoy's attorney, Waterbury-based solo practitioner Michelle Holmes, told the Connecticut Law Tribune on Wednesday she'd consider joining a class action down the road. "I haven't done anything to solicit new clients, but my client may know others that might come to me."
At issue with regard to pay, Holmes said, are claims the chain underpaid McAvoy "tens of thousands of dollars" in the 11 years she worked there by not paying her full minimum wage for non-server work. McAvoy quit in July 2019 "because everything became too overwhelming for her," Holmes said.
McAvoy, the lawsuit says, started the job at $5.59 an hour and was making $6 an hour when she quit. The law allows eateries to pay such wages as long as the employees can earn gratuities, or tips. But, the lawsuit alleges, there were many times McAvoy was doing non-service work, such as washing dishes, cleaning up and doing set-ups for special events, when she was still getting paid the lower rate. The state's minimum wage increased from $10.10 an hour to $11 an hour Oct. 1
Near the end of her employment, Holmes said, "approximately half the hours she was working were relegated to doing non-server work."
Holmes continued: "Discovery will be an important component of this case" to determine exactly how much her client is owed.
Toward the end of McAvoy's tenure, Holmes said, "they'd have her punch out but stay and wait for the manager on duty to close. She was also like an event organizer to some extent." Holmes said McAvoy was often required to handle extra events, including things like "Daddy Daughter Night" and Thursday theme nights.
"My client is a single mom and a hard worker," Holmes said. "She worked many hours and many years for Chili's and this is more than frustrating for her. It took a toll on her emotionally."
The lawsuit also alleges McAvoy was sexually harassed by a male dishwasher who groped her on a regular basis. Management did nothing to stop the alleged abuse, Holmes claims.
"The sexual harassment was ongoing and was a problem," Holmes said. "They did nothing to stop it. Anytime someone complains to an employer about being sexually harassed, they should do what is required by law. They could have taken steps to rectify the situation, whether that was to transfer him or fire him, but they did nothing."
Representing the local Chili's is Allison Dearington of Hartford-based Jackson Lewis. Dearington did not respond to a request for comment Wednesday.
The defendant, Chili's, had not filed a response to the lawsuit as of Wednesday.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBen & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
3 minute readHow Big Law Congressional Investigation Practices Will Stay Busy in 2025
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Senators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anti-Competitive Practices, Fees
- 2Deal Watch: Gibson Dunn, V&E, Kirkland Lead Big Energy Deals in Another Strong Week in Transactions
- 3Advisory Opinion Offers 'Road Map' for Judges Defending Against Campaign Attacks
- 4Commencement of Child Victims Act at Heart of Federal Question Posed to NY's Top Court
- 5Bolstering Southern California Presence, Sidley Austin Settles Into Revitalized Downtown LA Office
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250