Conn. Mother Sues Juul, Claiming E-Cigarettes Caused Son's Seizures
A Sherman mother has sued Juul on behalf of her teenage son, claiming he experienced seizures because of his continued use of Juul products.
December 19, 2019 at 03:37 PM
4 minute read
Amid similar lawsuits across the nation, a Connecticut mother is suing the makers of Juul e-cigarettes, claiming the products caused her teenage son to experience seizures after he became addicted to nicotine.
San Francisco-based Juul Labs, founded in 2015 as an arm of cigarette manufacturer Altria Group Inc. and its subsidiary, Philip Morris USA Inc., has faced recent allegations that it marketed its products to underage users. The most recent lawsuit in Connecticut was filed by Sherman resident Catherine Faulds on behalf of her son, identified as "G.F."
Faulds claims her son "developed a nicotine addiction and suffered multiple seizures as a result of his use of a Juul device and flavored Juul pods." The lawsuit alleges Juul's fraudulent concealment "was a substantial factor" in G.F.'s "significant exposure to toxic substances, which may cause or contribute to plaintiff's seizures." Faulds also accuses Juul of unfair, unlawful and deceptive trade practices.
The lawsuit, which seeks compensatory and punitive damages of at least $75,000, claims G.F. began using the company's fruit flavors primarily mint and mango in October 2018, when he was 14 years old.
The lawsuit claims the company markets to teens by selling fruit-flavored products and featuring young models in advertisements. In G.F.'s case. the lawsuit alleges he developed a "severe nicotine addiction" and by the time of his initial seizure was vaping every day and consuming a pack of Juul pods per week.
G.F., the lawsuit says, experienced his first seizure while on vacation with his family in Virginia in July 2019. The lawsuit states he "experienced an intense head rush, and he began to seize for approximately five minutes." The teen was hospitalized and required a lumbar puncture, chest X-ray, CT scan of his head and blood tests.
Due to addiction to Juul products, the lawsuit says, G.F. continued to use e-cigarettes and suffered another seizure in a locker room at his high school Oct. 19.
The lawsuit claims G.F. was unaware vaping could cause seizures and that his use has "permanently injured and altered his developing brain."
Lawsuits have been filed concurrently in the San Francisco Unified School District and four nearby school districts, claiming Juul's marketing efforts have resulted in students getting hooked on e-cigarettes. The company is also fighting lawsuits in Florida, Illinois and New York, among other states.
Juul's media relations department did not respond to a request for comment Thursday, and the company had not yet assigned an attorney to handle the Connecticut complaint.
As with other lawsuits against Juul, the Faulds suit claims the company intentionally marketed its products to minors. After Gov. Ned Lamont took note of the potential health issue this summer, Connecticut increased the age for the legal use of e-cigarettes from 18 to 21 in October.
Faulds claims that "even though e-cigarettes are unsafe, Juul heavily promoted its products to young people. Following the wildly successful playbook laid out in historic cigarette industry documents, defendants leveraged social media and utilized other marketing and promotion tactics, long outlawed for cigarette companies, to capture the highly lucrative youth market."
The lawsuit adds: "Juul preyed on youth using media and themes that exploit young persons' vulnerabilities to create and sustain nicotine addiction, all for financial gain, and without giving warnings about the serious risks of addiction, seizures, cardiovascular and brain injuries, and other permanent injuries."
The family is represented by Curt Marshall and Ellen Relkin of Weitz & Luxenberg in New York. "It's a terrible situation," Relkin said. "A 15-year-old boy wound up in a hospital with a frightening seizure and again had a seizure in a school locker room. The FDA has warned about seizures associated with a E-cigarette use."
Related stories:
Connecticut Man Sues Juul Labs Over Nicotine-Induced Anxiety From E-Cigarettes
Connecticut AG Investigates Juul Over Alleged Smoking-Cessation Claims Using E-Cigarettes
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Administration Faces Legal Challenge Over EO Impacting Federal Workers
3 minute readSettlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Data Disposition—Conquering the Seemingly Unscalable Mountain
- 2Who Are the Judges Assigned to Challenges to Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order?
- 3Litigators of the Week: A Directed Verdict Win for Cisco in a West Texas Patent Case
- 4Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 5Womble Bond Becomes First Firm in UK to Roll Out AI Tool Firmwide
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250