Connecticut Company Sued Over Fire That Killed Dozens of Filipino Workers
A lawsuit alleges a fire in a Philippines call center that killed dozens of workers in 2017 was due in part to the negligence of a Connecticut-based company.
January 29, 2020 at 06:06 PM
4 minute read
A Connecticut company doing business overseas is fending off litigation, after finding itself at the center of a tragedy that took place nearly 9,000 miles away.
Shelton-based Dynata LLC operated a call-center in Davao City, Philippines, where 38 people died in a fire, according to litigation playing out in Waterbury Superior Court. But it allegedly put profits over safety, according to the complaint by Waterbury-based solo attorney Joseph DeCicco, the court-appointed administrator of the workers' estates.
The company, the lawsuit says, "took jobs away from the United States, outsourced those jobs to a foreign company that they operated and controlled, and exploited the disadvantages of foreign citizens by paying very little in wage and benefits and providing little or no workplace safety oversight in order to keep operational costs as low as possible and business profits as high as possible."
The suit continues: "The labor cost, due to outsourcing of these jobs by defendant Dynata LLC, represents a huge saving to defendant," which allegedly paid staff $175 to $350 a month. The majority of the calls made from the call center were polling and data inquiries conducted in English and placed to individuals living in the United States.
Dynata, formerly known as Survey Sampling International LLC, ran the call center in the Philippines through its agent, SSI Philippines Inc. The December 2017 fire occurred on the fourth floor, and those killed were trapped and unable to exit the building, according to information from plaintiff counsel at the Nolan Law Group in Chicago.
Nolan Law Group attorney Donald Nolan and Thomas Routh are working alongside local counsel in Connecticut, Jamie Sullivan, a partner with Hartford-based Howard, Kohn, Sprague & FitzGerald.
"There was little oversight of the management of the facility. It appears that the negligence on behalf of the defendants and their agents is clear, and that they failed to exercise reasonable action to prevent the deaths of these individuals," Routh said. "This lawsuit is also about making changes so this does not happen again."
The lawsuit doesn't specify damages, but Routh said, "We had a number of death cases, and that will be very significant as far as damages go."
The complaint was filed on behalf of 29 of the 38 people who died in the fire. In addition to defendant Dynata, the suit names two Connecticut-based executives who helped run the company when it was known as Survey Sampling International. The co-defendants, David Weather and former president and chief executive officer Christopher Fanning, no longer work for the company.
Representing Dynata is Greenwich-based Withers Bergman partner James Nealon, who declined to comment on the matter Wednesday. Dynata, through a representative, told the Connecticut Law Tribune it wouldn't comment because the case is pending. Weather also declined to comment, while Fanning didn't respond to a request for comment.
According to the lawsuit, Philippines fire safety officials "repeatedly warned of unsafe, dangerous, and life-threatening conditions that existed in the premises in which plaintiff decedents worked. Yet those known dangerous conditions and others persisted for years through and including the time of this tragedy."
For instance, the lawsuit says, a fire alarm for the fourth floor was not connected to the alarm systems for the three other floors of the building and didn't function properly. And, the suit says, steel lockers obstructed one of the two exits on the fourth floor, leaving it inaccessible.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
State High Court Adopts Modern Standard for Who Keeps $70K Engagement Ring After Breakup
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250