UPDATE: Fotis Dulos Has Died
Experts weigh in on the status of the Fotis Dulos murder trial after Dulos tried to kill himself.
January 30, 2020 at 03:07 PM
5 minute read
Accused spousal murderer Fotis Dulos, recently hospitalized in New York after reportedly attempting suicide at his Farmington home, has died, according to media reports and his attorney, Norm Pattis. Dulos died at 5:32 p.m., Pattis confirmed to reporters.
Earlier today, Connecticut lawyers discussed the next steps in the case of the death of Dulos's wife, Jennifer. That story follows:
The big question two days after Fotis Dulos' attempted suicide on Tuesday is whether the man charged with killing his wife, Jennifer Dulos, will be competent to participate in the legal proceedings against him.
Among legal experts and forensic psychologists, the consensus Thursday was that the trial will likely not take place if Dulos is not legally competent, and unable to understand the charges against him. This will likely end the criminal case against Dulos, a real estate developer facing prosecution after the disappearance of the mother of his five children.
If that happens, experts say Dulos will likely end up in a mental health care facility.
Dulos' lawyers rushed to the hospital earlier this week to be with their client, who reportedly attempted suicide at his Farmington home. Soon after, lead counsel Norm Pattis said in court that Dulos' condition was "dire."
"The first issue is competence," said Shipman & Goodwin attorney James Bergenn, a longtime criminal defense attorney who is not involved in the Dulos case. "Otherwise, you do not have a meaningful Sixth Amendment right."
White-collar and federal criminal attorney Richard Brown of Hartford's Brown, Paindiris & Scott agreed.
"The obvious and controlling question is the ability of Dulos to recover from his attempted suicide, and the effect it has on his intellectual capacity to understand what is going on," Brown said.
Neither Pattis or prosecutor Richard Colangelo Jr. were available for comment.
Denver, Colorado-based forensic psychologist and attorney Dr. Susan Lewis never treated Dulos, but has followed the case. Authorities performing a safety check reportedly discovered Dulos after a suicide attempt in his garage.
"Sometimes people make (suicide) attempts that are not that serious. This one was pretty serious," Lewis said. "I'm not sure if it was manipulative, but it may have been impulsive."
The experts don't anticipate civil litigation or liability against Dulos' legal team given that their client showed no outward signs of major depression or suicidal tendencies.
"It appears there was no depression or signs of mental illness," Lewis said. "It's nobody's responsibility but his own."
Brown, an attorney for 47 years, said defense attorneys are obligated to alert the court if their client suffers from mental health issues, although that does not appear to be the case with regard to Dulos.
"Attorneys are not licensed physicians," Brown said.
Bergenn agreed.
"There was no evidence in advance that this was a reasonably foreseeable event, He was not showing signs of depression or anything else that would lead you to believe he'd take his own life," Bergenn said. "I've never heard of an attorney being held liable for someone's suicide that was not manifestly imminent."
|The prosecutors
What do the prosecutors in the Dulos case do now?
The answer, according to the experts: Wait.
"It will be a long thoughtful process on the part of the prosecution on what to do next," Bergenn said.
Typically, Brown said, the prosecution will continue the case indefinitely for medical justification when a person is incapacitated.
"There is no trial if there is not competency, other than housekeeping items," Brown said. "There is no proceeding on the merits."
The prosecutors, Bergenn said, "are taking a breath. This does not require any immediate judgment as he awaits the medical information."
Bergenn has no involvement in the Dulos matter, but has monitored the case and talked to defense counsel Pattis. He said he doesn't believe there is a strong case against Michelle Troconis, Dulos' girlfriend, or lawyer Kent Mawhinney, who once represented Dulos in a civil case. Both are charged with conspiracy to commit murder.
"The public record information simply doesn't establish, beyond a reasonable doubt [the guilt of Troconis and Mawhinney]," Bergenn said. "In Connecticut, I've seen very few prosecutors in my 40 years of this work willing to proceed with a case that they are not personally convinced of beyond a reasonable doubt."
Bergenn continued: "There is another arena worth pondering. In the event of death, you will see a civil action like in the Goldman and O.J. Simpson case. Although, Dulos' assets will probably go to the five kids anyway."
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDC Judge Rules Russia Not Immune in Ukrainian Arbitration Award Dispute
2 minute readRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250