Likely to Be Denied, Norm Pattis Presses for Trial of Dead Client: 'I Do Suppose I'm Angry'
"I know the chances of success are somewhere between zero and 0.00001%," Pattis said.
February 03, 2020 at 01:40 PM
3 minute read
Norm Pattis wants his client to have his day in court, even though that client, Fotis Dulos, is dead.
And Pattis says he's willing to petition the U.S. Supreme Court to make it happen, even though he's likely to fail.
Pattis filed a motion to substitute Dulos' estate as the defendant in the hope of continuing the upcoming trial of his client, who was charged with murder following his wife's disappearance. Dulos died Thursday by suicide, after an attempt two days earlier.
"I do suppose I am angry," Pattis said. "I was born ornery."
Click here to read the full motion
Pattis conceded Monday he had little chance of prevailing. Yet he vowed to move the motion up the courts, until he's exhausted every the legal avenue in what he expects to be a "daunting" review process.
"I know the chances of success are somewhere between zero and 0.00001%," he said.
Related: 'Vicious Piece of Scum': Connecticut Lawyer Getting Hate Mail for Defending Fotis Dulos
So why is Pattis, an attorney who has taken on numerous infamous clients, including conspiracy theorist and Info Wars talk show host Alex Jones, continuing to keep the Dulos case afloat?
Because, Pattis said, he believes the state overplayed its hand when it charged his client with the murder of mother-of-five Jennifer Dulos, who disappeared in May.
"We want access to the state's discovery, because we still have not seen it," Pattis said.
Prosecutors have remained silent as to their next move, but the criminal case against Dulos is likely to end with the defendant's death.
Richard Colangelo Jr. declined to comment for this report, saying the case is an active pending legal matter. Colangelo is still acting as the state's attorney for the Judicial District of Stamford/Norwalk, even though he was named chief state's attorney Thursday.
'I was searching myself'
Meanwhile, Pattis said he has no doubt his client had nothing to do with his wife's disappearance. And the New Haven-based defense attorney partly blamed the media for Dulos' troubles.
"I still don't understand the fascination and preoccupation with this case," Pattis said. "The questions they were asking were entirely consistent with his being guilty. Reporters were shouting out questions like, 'Where is the body?' as he was walking into the courthouse, and 'Why did you do this to Jennifer?' He was tried and convicted in the court of public opinion, and his death was the functional equivalent of an execution."
Pattis also said he's bracing for civil litigation, which often follows the estate of a defendant such as Dulos, a real estate developer who assets are likely in the crosshairs.
The defense lawyer added that Dulos' suicide led to introspection.
"You, as an attorney, always say, 'I will do better, do better, do better.' But sometimes you fail," he said. "If there were obvious signs, I missed them. I am searching myself to ask what I could have done better."
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Battle of the Experts': Bridgeport Jury Awards Defense Verdict to Stamford Hospital
3 minute readSettlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 2Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 3Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 4Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
- 5Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250