Experts: Prosecution Likely to Proceed Against Lawyer Implicated in Fotis Dulos Case
Experts the Connecticut Law Tribune spoke to say that the case against attorney Kent Mawhinney, who was implicated in the disappearance of Jennifer Dulos, will likely proceed even though Fotis Dulos, Jennifer's husband, died from suicide last week. Fotis Dulos was charged with murder in the death of his wife, who went missing in May and was never found.
February 04, 2020 at 10:17 AM
4 minute read
Legal experts believe that prosecutors will move forward with their case against Bloomfield attorney Kent Mawhinney, who has been charged with conspiracy to commit murder.
They say the case against the attorney is likely to proceed, even though the prime suspect, real estate developer Fotis Dulos, died by suicide Thursday. Fotis had been awaiting trial for murder of his wife Jennifer, who disappeared in May.
Now, the fate of an attorney hangs in the balance.
Mawhinney, a Connecticut lawyer for 29 years, received his law degree from Western New England College in 1990. He specialized in immigration law. He was friends with Dulos, and represented him in several civil matters.
But Mawhinney's law license was suspended Jan. 28, and he remains behind bars, unable to post a $2 million bond. While the criminal case unfolds, a court-appointed trustee will look at the defendant-lawyer's caseload, contact his clients, and refer them to other counsel as needed, according to former Connecticut chief disciplinary counsel Mark Dubois, an attorney with New London's Geraghty & Bonnano.
Mawhinney's most notable tie-in to the Dulos case involves the Windsor Rod and Gun Club, which Mawhinney helped start. Court documents show that a few days before Jennifer Dulos went missing, two hunters found what appeared to be a makeshift shallow grave near the gun club. A hole had been dug in the ground, but there were no signs of human remains, according to media reports.
|'How can they bargain here?'
While the experts the Connecticut Law Tribune spoke to Monday said the state will probably either offer Mawhinney a plea or try the case, they agreed the evidence is flimsy at best. Dulos' death will also probably not sway the prosecution's decision to move forward with the case, they said.
"To be frank, my opinion from reading the affidavit is that to call this a weak case is an understatement," said longtime New Haven criminal defense lawyer John Williams. "It's a nothing case. I can't believe a judge signed that warrant because it does not allege anything. It's all speculation upon speculation. There are a lot of might have been's. It's disgusting and all that shallow grave stuff is all speculation."
Criminal defense attorney James Bergenn of Shipman & Goodwin agreed.
"There is nothing in the public record that puts Mawhinney as a co-conspirator in advance of the murder," Bergenn said. "All I can see in the public records is that Dulos and Mawhinney were buddies, had an attorney-client relationship, and each had problems going through a divorce."
Mawhinney is also charged with spousal sexual assault and violating a protective order related to his wife.
Lee Gold, Mawhinney's attorney and counsel with Hartford's Butler, Norris & Gold, declined to comment Monday, saying the matter is an active criminal case.
Meanwhile, Dubois, who spent years prosecuting attorney-ethics case, said Mawhinney "lost a big bargaining chip" when Dulos died.
"The question now is what does he know, if anything, and how can they bargain here?" Dubois said. "Ninety-nine percent of criminal cases end with some kind of plea bargain. It will probably happen in this case."
Richard Colangelo Jr., who was named chief state's attorney last week, is also still acting as state's attorney for the Stamford/Norwalk judicial district. He is prosecuting the case against Mawhinney. He declined to discuss the matter Monday because the case is ongoing.
Michele Troconis, Dulos' girlfriend, is also charged with conspiracy to commit murder. She posted bond, and her case is pending.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDC Judge Rules Russia Not Immune in Ukrainian Arbitration Award Dispute
2 minute readRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250