Hartford Lawyer in Troconis Case Says He's Never Been Hounded Like This Before
Jon Schoenhorn, attorney for Michelle Troconis who has been implicated in the disappearance of Jennifer Dulos, said the media coverage has been intense.
February 10, 2020 at 04:51 PM
4 minute read
No novice in representing clients in the media spotlight, Hartford-based attorney Jon Schoenhorn is now representing the most infamous client of all.
That client, Michelle Troconis, is charged with conspiracy to commit murder over the high-profile disappearance of Jennifer Dulos.
Schoenhorn is no stranger to the news media. But he says this case has drawn intense interest, prompting late-night media calls, including a request for a midnight interview.
A former Connecticut newspaper reporter, Schoenhorn's 38-year law practice has included a slew of recognizable names. For instance, he represented James "Bo" Gritz, a former Green Beret lieutenant colonel who was the inspiration for the movie "Rambo." The attorney defended Gritz, who'd been charged with attempted kidnapping in Suffield in the 1990s.
The Jon. L. Schoenhorn & Associates principal and former president of the Criminal Defense Lawyers Association has represented murder suspects, plaintiffs in constitutional law issues and challenged youth-curfew laws.
But Troconis' case stands out, and promises to be especially complex.
Troconis was the live-in girlfriend of Fotis Dulos, whose wife disappeared. She and Dulos' friend, former attorney Kent Mawhinney, have been charged with conspiracy to commit murder. Dulos, meanwhile, was awaiting trial for murder, when he died by suicide.
Troconis has also been charged with tampering with evidence and hindering prosecution. Media reports indicate that she told police she had no idea why she and Fotis Dulos had gone to Hartford the same day Jennifer Dulos was reported missing. The pair allegedly had garbage bags investigators said could have contained incriminating evidence from a murder scene.
Her lawyer suggested Troconis has become a scapegoat after the death of the prosecutors' prime suspect.
"Michelle was a bit player," Schoenhorn said Monday. "But now that the big fish is gone, they are turning to who is left to justify millions of [taxpayers'] dollars in … investigation."
Schoenhorn was at Troconis' side Friday as the 45-year-old former publicist pleaded not guilty in court to conspiracy to commit murder. He took over the case from attorney Andrew Bowman.
|Influx of requests
Schoenhorn said he knows how to handle the media, having worked two stints with the Republican-American newspaper. This time, though, he concedes the media has inundated him with requests.
"There has been a lot of hounding," Schoenhorn said. "I've been asked to appear on every network news outlets magazine show and their prime-time shows. I'm not shy by any means, but those requests are not appropriate at this time."
While Schoenhorn has spoken to some local media outlets, he said he doesn't plan on doing an all-out media blitz until he has more facts about the case.
"It's annoying to get a text at 11:30 p.m. … from a national network asking if I'd do a midnight Skype interview to appear the next day," he said. "They asked if I'd mind, and I said I would."
Schoenhorn, 65, said he can do without the "snarky tweets by some in the media, especially the New York media."
"I believe in communicating facts, but I want the public to know what is happening, to know the truth, and to distinguish between fact, speculation and fiction," he said,
Meanwhile, Schoenhorn said he was never given the police interviews with his client, despite assurances he'd get them. When he does get those interviews, Schoenhorn said, he'll look at the possibility that language barriers could have affected Troconis' answers to police. Her first language is Spanish.
Chief State's Attorney Richard Colangelo, who is prosecuting the case, declined to comment because the matter is pending.
The next court date is March 20.
Since the alleged crimes occurred in Hartford and Avon, Schoenhorn said the case should be heard in Hartford and not in Norwalk and Stamford, where it's currently being heard.
He said, "We will work on getting the case back to where it belongs."
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
State High Court Adopts Modern Standard for Who Keeps $70K Engagement Ring After Breakup
Trending Stories
- 1European, US Litigation Funding Experts Look for Commonalities at NYU Event
- 2UPS Agrees to $45M Settlement With SEC Over Valuation Claim
- 3For Midsize Law Firms, Curbing Boys-Club Culture Starts with Diversity at the Top
- 4Southern California Law Firms Boast Industry-Leading Revenue, Demand Through Q3
- 5AI: An Enhancement, Not a Replacement for Attorneys
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250