Prioritizing Injuries by Severity Helps Lawyer Secure Workers' Comp Settlement
Hartford attorney Alex Sarris has secured a $250,000 workers' compensation award for his client, who had numerous work-related injuries over several years.
February 11, 2020 at 07:34 PM
3 minute read
Faced with a client with numerous worker-related injuries over several years, plaintiffs attorney Alexander Sarris had some research and strategizing to do.
Sarris, an associate with Hartford-based Cicchiello & Cicchiello, secured a $250,000 workers' compensation settlement for client Timothy Johnson on Jan. 30, but not before he highlighted Johnson's most serious injuries upfront.
Instead of a litany of hurt, the attorney made it clear which injuries had caused his client the most suffering.
The 62-year-old Johnson, who had worked for Daniels Oil Company Inc. from 2004 to 2016 as a service technician, had numerous injuries on the job, from incidents in 2012, 2013 and 2016. They ranged from serious injury to his right shoulder, lumbar spine and back, and lesser ones to the left shoulder and arm.
Johnson had hurt his lower back while replacing a tank in 2012. He'd then slipped on a wet hatchway door, injuring his left knee the following year. And his right leg went through a hole in the floor while he was walking across an attic in a home in 2016.
"The most challenging part of this case was going through the medical records," Sarris said Tuesday. "The less severe injuries needed to be highlighted too, but they have lesser value. It's better to highlight the most severe injuries, and what they are likely to entail in the future."
Representing the defendant company was Nicholas Varunes of Hartford-based Varunes & Associates.
Varunes did not respond to a request for comment Tuesday. But Sarris said the defense's first offer was for $225,000, compared to the plaintiff's initial demand for $550,000. The parties ended up agreeing on $250,000 that insurance carrier Federated Mutual Insurance Co. is set to pay in one lump sum.
"That's the absolute maximum they would pay," Sarris said. "They did a cost-benefit analysis and came up with the $250,000 figure."
Sarris said Johnson had multiple surgeries to his right shoulder and right knee, and had numerous injections in his back.
"He has limitations lifting, bending and carrying things that are heavy," the attorney said.
Due in part to his age and injuries, Johnson retired in 2016.
Sarris said, "It was unlikely that he'd ever return to work in any meaningful capacity."
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBen & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
3 minute readHow Big Law Congressional Investigation Practices Will Stay Busy in 2025
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250