New Haven Lawyer Honed In on Jurors' Passions to Win $1M Verdict
Asking the right questions during jury selection helped New Haven attorney Mohan Sreenivasan secure a more than $1 million verdict for his client.
February 12, 2020 at 06:17 PM
3 minute read
Confident the questions he'd be asking during jury selection about passion and negligence could end up meaning a large payout for his client, New Haven-based plaintiff attorney Mohan Sreenivasan took the gamble and put his faith in the jurors.
That faith paid off to the tune of $1,026,871.
Sreenivasan's client, 48-year-old New Haven resident Willie Kelly, is set to receive $821,497, because the jury assigned 20% of the blame to the plaintiff. His suffered lasting injuries after a tractor-trailer that defendant Don Jin Yeun was driving sideswiped Kelly's Mercedes E320 station wagon, according to court pleadings.
For plaintiff counsel, the litigation hinged on persuading jurors that Kelly had lost more than physical comfort and health that day, and that the crash deprived him of several passions. A bulging disc in the lower back meant permanent pain would encroach on basketball and other activities that helped Kelly in his work with at-risk youth.
Sreenivasan co-owns Calabrese + Sreenivasan with his wife Randi. He took over the motor vehicle tort case in September 2019 from other attorneys, and fielded a $60,000 offer from the defense to settle. He declined the offer, because Sreenivasan was confident he could select the right jurors to shift the case in his client's favor.
"When I was picking the jury, I asked each of them what is something they were passionate about. There were two golfers, one who cooked and one who did woodworking," he said. "I then asked them in the event they were not able to pursue their passion because of someone else's negligence, do they think there was value there? The ones that said, 'Yes,' I kept on the jury, and the ones that said, 'No,' I would replace. You just got rid of them."
After jury selection, Sreenivasan said he was feeling confident. He said he wasn't surprised with the verdict rendered on Feb. 5.
"Huge cases are won and lost during jury selection," he said. "I knew the questions I was going to ask. Human beings are passionate about how they enjoy in life. This might not have been a death case, but because this accident took away his passions, it could have just as well been a death case."
The strategy worked.
Jurors found Yeun 80% responsible for the accident, assigning the remainder of the blame to Kelly.
Defense counsel Nathan Mayhew, of Ryan Ryan DeLuca in Hartford, represented Yeun and employer Heartland Express.
Mayhew didn't respond to a request for comment Wednesday, but his answer and special defense to the fourth amended complaint show the defendants blamed Kelly's driving for the crash.
"Such negligence on the part of the plaintiff was the substantial factor in producing the damages and losses" suffered, Mayhew argued.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
State High Court Adopts Modern Standard for Who Keeps $70K Engagement Ring After Breakup
Trending Stories
- 1House Passes Bill to Add Federal Judgeships in Face of Biden Veto Threat
- 2As AI-Generated Fraud Rises, Financial Companies Face a Long Cybersecurity Battle
- 3Texas Lawyer, Client Sued for $10 Million Over Bitcoin Mining Deal
- 4Final Misconduct Hearing Date Impending for Fulton Judge
- 5Senate Panel Postpones Vote on Reconfirmation of Democrat Crenshaw to SEC
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250