New Haven Lawyer Honed In on Jurors' Passions to Win $1M Verdict
Asking the right questions during jury selection helped New Haven attorney Mohan Sreenivasan secure a more than $1 million verdict for his client.
February 12, 2020 at 06:17 PM
3 minute read
Confident the questions he'd be asking during jury selection about passion and negligence could end up meaning a large payout for his client, New Haven-based plaintiff attorney Mohan Sreenivasan took the gamble and put his faith in the jurors.
That faith paid off to the tune of $1,026,871.
Sreenivasan's client, 48-year-old New Haven resident Willie Kelly, is set to receive $821,497, because the jury assigned 20% of the blame to the plaintiff. His suffered lasting injuries after a tractor-trailer that defendant Don Jin Yeun was driving sideswiped Kelly's Mercedes E320 station wagon, according to court pleadings.
For plaintiff counsel, the litigation hinged on persuading jurors that Kelly had lost more than physical comfort and health that day, and that the crash deprived him of several passions. A bulging disc in the lower back meant permanent pain would encroach on basketball and other activities that helped Kelly in his work with at-risk youth.
Sreenivasan co-owns Calabrese + Sreenivasan with his wife Randi. He took over the motor vehicle tort case in September 2019 from other attorneys, and fielded a $60,000 offer from the defense to settle. He declined the offer, because Sreenivasan was confident he could select the right jurors to shift the case in his client's favor.
"When I was picking the jury, I asked each of them what is something they were passionate about. There were two golfers, one who cooked and one who did woodworking," he said. "I then asked them in the event they were not able to pursue their passion because of someone else's negligence, do they think there was value there? The ones that said, 'Yes,' I kept on the jury, and the ones that said, 'No,' I would replace. You just got rid of them."
After jury selection, Sreenivasan said he was feeling confident. He said he wasn't surprised with the verdict rendered on Feb. 5.
"Huge cases are won and lost during jury selection," he said. "I knew the questions I was going to ask. Human beings are passionate about how they enjoy in life. This might not have been a death case, but because this accident took away his passions, it could have just as well been a death case."
The strategy worked.
Jurors found Yeun 80% responsible for the accident, assigning the remainder of the blame to Kelly.
Defense counsel Nathan Mayhew, of Ryan Ryan DeLuca in Hartford, represented Yeun and employer Heartland Express.
Mayhew didn't respond to a request for comment Wednesday, but his answer and special defense to the fourth amended complaint show the defendants blamed Kelly's driving for the crash.
"Such negligence on the part of the plaintiff was the substantial factor in producing the damages and losses" suffered, Mayhew argued.
Read more:
Cheshire Attorney Clinches $200,000 Settlement for Woman Injured in Car Crash
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
3 minute readDC Lawsuits Seek to Prevent Mass Firings and Public Naming of FBI Agents
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Parties’ Reservation of Rights Defeats Attempt to Enforce Settlement in Principle
- 2ACC CLO Survey Waves Warning Flags for Boards
- 3States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 4Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 5Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250