Morale Low at Department of Justice Under William Barr's Leadership, Ex-Staffers Say
Three former Department of Justice employees discuss their reasons for signing a letter calling for U.S. Attorney General William Barr to step down.
February 19, 2020 at 05:32 PM
5 minute read
Connecticut residents who were among former Department of Justice employees demanding the resignation of U.S. Attorney General William Barr say morale has waned at the federal agency.
The Connecticut signatories were among more than 2,000 ex-Justice Department employees who signed a letter demanding Barr's ouster over the sentencing of Roger Stone, a political consultant who worked on President Donald Trump's election campaign. They left the DOJ before Barr headed the agency, but have maintained contact with former colleagues.
"I'd say the mood there is really low," said Asha Rangappa, a senior lecturer at the Jackson Institute for Global Affairs and a former FBI special agent who served in the Justice Department from 2002 to 2005. "It's very disheartening. I think there is probably some soul-searching on whether or not they should themselves resign, or whether it's better to stay."
|
Related story—'Amazingly Courageous': What Lawyers Are Saying About the Stone Prosecutors Who Quit
Rangappa, now a CNN commentator, was among the letter's thousands of signatories, including several attorneys and former prosecutors.
"I don't recall, in my lifetime, there being this much of a groundswell of a movement for an attorney general to resign," she said.
No one from the U.S. Department of Justice's office of public affairs responded to a request for comment Wednesday.
|'Sigh deeply'
Kristan Peters-Hamlin, a Connecticut-based solo practitioner and former assistant U.S. attorney in Washington, D.C., from 1991 to 1996, also signed the letter.
"Many DOJ people are concerned about serving under an attorney general who appears to confuse his role with that of personal attorney to the president," Peters-Hamlin said. "In my discussions with them about the current situation, some will roll their eyes and sigh deeply. Many are horrified that Donald Trump does not have sufficient respect for the rule of law and that the attorney general is not showing more neutrality and independence."
That perception might have changed, though, as a rift appeared between the president and the attorney general. On Feb. 13, Barr sat for an interview with ABC News in which he said Trump's tweets made it impossible for the attorney general to do his job.
Trump tweeted several times about the Stone case. He suggested he thought a nine-year prison sentence was too harsh for Stone, who'd been convicted of witness tampering, obstruction and lying to Congress during special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation of alleged Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.
"Cannot allow this miscarriage of justice!" Trump tweeted at 1:48 a.m. on Feb. 11.
After the president's tweet the Justice Department changed direction on the Stone case. Prosecutors, who had asked the court to impose the maximum sentence, submitted a new brief saying that punishment would have been too severe.
Critics who signed the letter said they did so because of what they saw as the president's interference.
And four federal prosecutors quit the Stone case.
Meanwhile, Barr appeared to have high-ranking supporters, despite calls for his resignation.
The Hill website reported that top U.S. House and Senate Republicans, in a show of support for the embattled attorney general, issued a statement praising Barr as a "man of the highest character and unquestionable integrity."
|'Not about Democrats and Republicans'
But thousands of former federal staffers disagree.
Among them: Felice Duffy, who worked as an assistant U.S. attorney for the DOJ in Connecticut from 2005 to 2015. Like the other Connecticut signatories, she said the move took a lot of soul-searching.
"It was not an easy letter to sign," said Duffy, now a New Haven solo practitioner. "I signed the letter to show support for those four federal prosecutors who were doing what they believed in, and were trained to do by the Department of Justice—and that is to stand up, and treat everyone equally under the law."
Rangappa agreed, and said fellow attorneys, even those with no DOJ ties, should care about what is taking place in Washington, D.C.
"The legal profession is one in which principle matters more than politics and ideology," she said. "I think the principle of law is at stake here. The attorney general is the chief law enforcement officer in the country, and he should embody ideals in how he dispenses justice. But right now, the principle is being trampled on."
All three former employees say Justice Department employees are not political. They say many staffer have worked for both Democratic and Republican administrations.
"It's not about Democrats and Republicans," Rangappa said. "It never entered the conversations at the water cooler or anywhere else."
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPatent Disputes Over SharkNinja, Dyson Products Nearing Resolution
Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
DC Judge Rules Russia Not Immune in Ukrainian Arbitration Award Dispute
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Just Ahead of Oral Argument, Fubo Settles Antitrust Case with Disney, Fox, Warner Bros.
- 2Best Practices for Adopting and Adapting to AI: Mitigating Risk in Light of Increasing Regulatory and Shareholder Scrutiny
- 3FOMO Run Amok? Resolve of Firms Chasing AI Dreams Tested by Sky-High Costs
- 4Sam Butler, Longtime Cravath Presiding Partner, Dies at 94
- 5French Rape Case Highlights Need for Vigilance, Education
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250