Holding Out Despite Preexisting Injuries: How a Glastonbury Litigator Did It
Glastonbury attorney Andrew Garza helped secure $355,000 for his client, who reinjured his right knee in a motor vehicle accident in Windsor in 2016.
February 24, 2020 at 05:04 PM
4 minute read
Plaintiffs counsel Andrew Garza had a choice to make: Take the $80,000 offered his client in a motor vehicle tort or do the extra work and preparation needed to resolve the matter. He chose the latter.
Faced with defense lawyers offering that amount of money to resolve the lawsuit in which the plaintiff had said he'd reinjured his right knee in a car accident just four months after surgery, Garza, a Glastonbury-based attorney, said he knew he could have a winning case in the six figures and not the five figures if he moved forward and did his homework.
Here is the dilemma Garza, co-owner of Connecticut Trial Firm LLC, was faced with: His client Joshua Paulo reinjured his right knee in a car accident in which he was the passenger. Only months before, Paulo had surgery on that very same knee and, Garza knew, that defense attorneys would make that an issue unless he got in front of the matter.
Here is how it paid off with Garza, securing a $355,000 settlement for his client Feb. 3.
Garza connected with Paulo's orthopedic surgeon and because of his client's youth—he was 19 at the time of the accident—a life care planner. Paulo's age, Garza said, worked in their favor.
"The life care planner said he had a life expectancy at the time of another 54 years. That's a long time." Garza said.
The orthopedic surgeon, Garza said, told both sides the damage to the right knee was due to the car accident. "The doctor spoke about how my client improved from the first surgery on his right knee and how the new injury was related to this accident," Garza said.
The personal-injury attorney's takeaway from the litigation: Don't assume that relatively low medical bills mean the case is worth less money.
"Very often attorneys undervalue cases where there was prior treatment," Garza said.
Garza said the $355,000 settlement, which has been disbursed, "is a good settlement in light of the uncertainty that the future brings and the prior condition of the knee."
Paulo sued his work colleague, Cody Borlen, and their employer, Cyr Relocation Inc. Borlen, according to the August 2017 lawsuit filed in Hartford Superior Court, rear-ended another vehicle in Windsor in June 2016. Paulo, a passenger in the company's Mazda CX5, sustained further injury to his right knee, which he struck on the dashboard, Garza said. Paulo was wearing a seat belt, his attorney said.
Borlen, who was not injured, was issued a police infraction for following too closely.
Paulo underwent his second surgery on his right knee in December 2018, Garza said.
Today, three and a half years after the car accident, Garza said his client "still has ongoing pain in his right knee." He might need future surgeries, Garza said.
Representing the defense is Deborah Jekot, an attorney with Hartford-based Howard, Kohn, Sprague & FitzGerald. Jekot did not respond to a request for comment Monday.
In court papers, the defense does not admit liability but rather leaves the plaintiff to prove the case. Trial was slated for June 2.
Paulo, who was a mover for Cyr Relocation at the time of the accident, is now in technical college, Garza said.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Really Deflating’: Judges React to Biden Threat to Veto New Judgeships Bill
US Judge Throws Out Sale of Infowars to The Onion. But That's Not the End of the Road for Sandy Hook Families
4 minute readAmid Growing Litigation Volume, Don't Expect UnitedHealthcare to Change Its Stripes After CEO's Killing
6 minute readAttorney Overcomes Low Medical Bills, Captures $1 Million Policy Limit
2 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1As AI-Generated Fraud Rises, Financial Companies Face a Long Cybersecurity Battle
- 2Texas Lawyer, Client Sued for $10 Million Over Bitcoin Mining Deal
- 3Final Misconduct Hearing Date Impending for Fulton Judge
- 4Senate Panel Postpones Vote on Reconfirmation of Democrat Crenshaw to SEC
- 5How Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250