Trump May Withhold Federal Grants Over Sanctuary Policies, 2nd Circuit Rules
The unanimous Second Circuit panel noted that the federal government maintains broad authority over states and municipalities when it comes to enforcing immigration policies.
February 26, 2020 at 03:20 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
In a win for the Trump administration, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled Wednesday that the Justice Department could withhold millions of dollars in federal law-enforcement grants from Connecticut, New York City and six other states over their sanctuary policies on immigration.
The unanimous ruling from a three-judge panel of the Manhattan-based appeals court lifted an injunction by a lower court that prevented the Trump administration from attaching immigration-related conditions to applications for federal funds under a federal grant program and placed the Second Circuit at odds with three other circuit courts that have upheld similar injunctions.
Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Washington, Massachusetts, Virginia and Rhode Island, along with New York City, had sued the Trump administration in 2017 over the federal requirements, which conditioned funding on states' willingness to allow federal immigration authorities access to jails and to provide advance notice when undocumented immigrant would be released from custody.
U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos of the Southern District of New York in 2018 ordered the Trump administration to release the funds, finding that the Justice Department lacked the legal authority to impose its conditions, which Ramos found to be "arbitrary and capricious."
The Second Circuit, however, said that the plain language of the relevant statutes had authorized the DOJ to make the changes. The panel also noted that the federal government maintains broad authority over states and municipalities when it comes to enforcing immigration policies.
"While mindful of the respect owed to our sister circuits, we cannot agree that the federal government must be enjoined from imposing the challenged conditions on the federal grants here at issue," Judge Reena Raggi of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, an appointee of President George W. Bush, wrote in a 77-page opinion.
"These conditions help the federal government enforce national immigration laws and policies supported by successive Democratic and Republican administrations. But more to the authorization point, they ensure that applicants satisfy particular statutory grant requirements imposed by Congress and subject to attorney general oversight," Raggi said.
Judges Ralph K. Winter and José A. Cabranes of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, a Ronald Reagan appointee and a Bill Clinton appointee, respectively, joined in the ruling.
Responding to the Second Circuit's decision Wednesday, Connecticut Attorney General William Tong issued a statement saying his office is "reviewing this decision and evaluating next steps. But this is clear—law enforcement officers have their hands more than full addressing serious public safety threats, including gun violence, the opioid epidemic and domestic violence. Placing arbitrary and partisan restrictions on law enforcement funding makes us all less safe, and does absolutely nothing to improve our immigration system."
So far, federal appeals courts in Philadelphia, Chicago and San Francisco have all upheld lower court injunctions blocking some or all of the challenged conditions.
The Justice Department, under then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions, announced a crackdown on sanctuary jurisdictions in 2017, saying cities and states that refused to share information with federal authorities would not be considered for justice assistance grants under the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Programs.
"So-called 'sanctuary' policies make all of us less safe because they intentionally undermine our laws and protect illegal aliens who have committed crimes," Sessions said in a June 2017 press release announcing the new policy.
Read More:
Federal Judge Blocks Trump Attempt to Withhold Funds From 'Sanctuary' Jurisdictions
States Defend Sanctuary City Policies, Citing SCOTUS Case on Sports Gambling
NY State, City Suing Trump Administration Over Rule Curtailing Funding for 'Sanctuary' Jurisdictions
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's Inspectors General Purge Could Make Policy Changes Easier, Observers Say
Trending Stories
- 1Thursday Newspaper
- 2Public Notices/Calendars
- 3Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-117
- 4Rejuvenation of a Sharp Employer Non-Compete Tool: Delaware Supreme Court Reinvigorates the Employee Choice Doctrine
- 5Mastering Litigation in New York’s Commercial Division Part V, Leave It to the Experts: Expert Discovery in the New York Commercial Division
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250