Time for Guns in Connecticut Courthouses? Call for Action After Marshals Assaulted
"It's a visual deterrent," said Superior Court Judge John Blawie. "It eases people's fears."
March 05, 2020 at 03:40 PM
4 minute read
With a man facing charges for allegedly running down two judicial marshals as he fled the Manchester courthouse Monday, some Connecticut court watchers want the state to ramp up courthouse security.
Their calls follow multiple incidents in recent years that have put the spotlight on courthouse safety.
"Certain marshals should be armed," said Joe Gaetano, president of the union that represents Connecticut's approximately 650 judicial marshals. "If people know they are armed, they will think twice about doing something that could put others in danger."
Gaetano's call follows a defendant's daring escape attempt.
Defendant Jose Lopez was in court to face a sixth-degree larceny charge, but dashed out of the courtroom, mowing down two marshals as he attempted to speed off in a car. He was charged Wednesday with first-degree assault, second-degree assault, two counts of assault on a public safety office, and evading responsibility after he attempted to flee the courthouse.
Gaetano recommends arming marshals posted at several areas in the courthouse, including near metal detectors, at front entrances and on prisoner-transportation teams—but not in courtrooms or in lock-up.
"The front doors are where they are needed," he said. "It's … a deterrent."
Superior Court Judge John Blawie, who presides at Stamford Superior Court, said armed personnel works. He said a state trooper, who has been posted in his courthouse since Feb. 24, has made a difference.
"It's a visual deterrent," Blawie said. "It eases people's fears. It's a symbol, I believe, that justice is going to be served. … We want people who come to feel like they can come to the courts in our state, without being in fear."
'On the Front Line'
The Lopez incident is one of many that have plagued courthouses from Connecticut to California.
For instance, in Decatur, Georgia, in 2018, a courtroom brawl spurred a mistrial. And in 2019, a man opened fire in a federal courthouse in Dallas. In 2014, a shooter fired at an Oakland, California, courthouse. In Connecticut, there was a quadruple shooting near the steps of the Bridgeport courthouse in January. That event led to the Judicial Branch to pay for six troopers to work overtime at six busy courthouses in the state to the tune of $17,819 a week.
Gaetano said budget cuts left a personnel shortage of 200 to 250 marshals across the state. He said the marshals that remain on the job are often anxious and nervous to come to work everyday.
"It can be very dangerous," Gaetano said. "If you happen, for example, to be in family court there could be violence when someone loses a house or their kids. Our guys are on the front line."
Gaetano said he's hoping, in the wake of Monday's incident, that either the judicial branch or Connecticut Legislature will approve a measure to arm state marshals.
Government officials appear to be weighing the issue.
Connecticut's House Judiciary Committee is looking into providing funding for arming state marshals, but is also grappling with the potential downsides of that measures, said Pullman & Comley attorney Steven Stafstrom Jr., who chairs the committee.
Stafstrom said he feels safe in the state's courthouses, but acknowledged "a rash of incidents lately which require action."
"Obviously, it's an added cost," Stafstrom said. "You need to purchase equipment and there is post training and certification. There is also the concern of having armed guards at the doors of the courthouse, because it will make it even less inviting and intimidating to the public who are entering the building to do business."
The Connecticut Judicial Branch did not offer anyone to speak on the topic, but did issue a statement that Chief Court Administrator Patrick Carroll III read before the Appropriations Committee in February.
In it, Carroll mentioned a "violent drive-by shooting" Jan. 27 outside a Bridgeport courthouse, and "other dangerous situations that jurors, detainees, staff, and the public have confronted while at court locations, including brawls, altercations, assaults, and the like." He said the incidents reinforced the judicial branch's "resolve to enhance safety and security in and around court building."
Carroll told to the committee, "I will need your support through an appropriation of $5.5 million to continue law enforcement coverage at all courthouses during peak vulnerability."
Related stories:
Sneak Attack: Inmate Punches Public Defender in Bond Court
In Texas, killing of two prosecutors turns spotlight on white supremacist group
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 128 Firms Supporting Retired Barnes & Thornburg Litigator in Georgia Supreme Court Malpractice Case
- 2Boosting Litigation and Employee Benefits Practices, Two Am Law 100 Firms Grow in Pittsburgh
- 3EMT Qualifies as 'Health Care Provider' Under Whistleblower Act, State Appellate Court Rules
- 4Bar Report - Feb. 3
- 5Was $1.3M in 'Incentive' Payments Commission? NJ Justices Weigh Arguments
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250