'We Had the Goods on Them': Small CT Firm Wins $18 Million for Tenants
An $18.7 million settlement was reached Friday between a New Haven attorney representing hundreds of tenants of a now-demolished New Haven apartment complex.
March 06, 2020 at 03:42 PM
4 minute read
It wasn't easy.
The plaintiff's side took photos of more than 270 apartments, and submitted medical information for hundreds of people in a landlord-tenant class action lawsuit.
But in the end, plaintiffs counsel David Rosen clinched an $18.7 million settlement, pending preliminary approval. His clients are 950 former tenants suing the owners of the now-demolished Church Street South Apartment Complex in New Haven.
"We are very pleased to get some measure of justice for people who don't always have that," Rosen said.
The settlement agreement—which was announced Friday—calls on Massachusetts-based Northland Investment Corp. to pay $13.2 million in base payments to tenants who lived in the 301-unit low-income apartment complex from December 2013 to December 2016. It also requires Northland to pay $2.65 million to those with mold-related injuries, $2.86 million in attorney fees and $200,000 in costs for administering the settlement.
Rosen, of David Rosen & Associates in New Haven, said the apartments in the complex, which was demolished in 2019, "had mold, bad air and water pouring from the ceiling."
"It was impossible to stay ahead of these conditions," he said. "You could bleach over and over, but they would still not resolve the problem."
The conditions in the complex led, in some cases, to respiratory ailments among tenants, Rosen said. A lawsuit was filed in October 2016.
The case pitted Rosen's small law firm against Northland's counsel at Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo—an Am Law 100 law firm with 500 attorneys in eight cities, including headquarters in Boston and offices in New York City, Washington, D.C., and London. Also representing Northland was Carmody Torrance Sandak & Hennessey, a midsize law firm with 75 attorneys in five Connecticut communities.
Representing Northland were David Hardy, Marc Kurzman and Fatima Lahnin, all of Carmody Torrance, as well as Henry Sullivan and Kevin McGinty with the Boston offices of Mintz Levin. The attorneys referred all inquiries to their client.
Northland, according to its website, is a real estate development company managing $3 billion in real estate properties in New England, Texas and the southern United States.
A statement emailed Friday afternoon on behalf of Lawrence Gottesdiener, the company's chairman and chief executive officer, read: "After several years of litigation, we were very pleased that we could come together with attorney Rosen, as well as mediator and retired Judge Jonathan Silbert, to reach a resolution which placed the needs of the families above everything else."
The company statement continues: "As part of the settlement, the families will have specified preferential rights on affordable apartments included in such a (proposed) development (on site). That was very important to us because it will allow some of the former residents to return home if they wish."
In the end, Rosen said, he believed the plaintiffs were able to secure a multimillion-dollar settlement with Northland because of the careful work it had done.
"They thought we had the goods on them," he said. "They also had another important reason, in that they wanted to get this off the books if they wanted to redevelop the area. They wanted to build something else there, and that wasn't going to happen until they were able to settle this lawsuit. They wanted to settle without the risk of going to trial."
According to the proposed settlement agreement, tenants who lived in the complex during the three-year period beginning in December 2013 will get at least $5,000.
"Some people will get $10,000, and some will get $14,000," Rosen said. "It all depends on how long they lived there."
Final approval on the preliminary settlement is expected July 6.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
State High Court Adopts Modern Standard for Who Keeps $70K Engagement Ring After Breakup
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Senate Panel Postpones Vote on Reconfirmation of Democrat Crenshaw to SEC
- 2How Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
- 3Insurers Dodge Sherwin-Williams' Claim for $102M Lead Paint Abatement Payment, State High Court Rules
- 4Supply Chain Challenges and Opportunities Under the Second Trump Administration
- 5As Atlanta Partners Moved to Am Law 200 Firms at a Higher Rate in 2024, 2 New Arrivals Benefited
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250